• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孤儿疫苗的开发:行业视角

Development of orphan vaccines: an industry perspective.

作者信息

Lang J, Wood S C

机构信息

R&D Clinical Development Department, Pasteur Mérieux Connaught, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Emerg Infect Dis. 1999 Nov-Dec;5(6):749-56. doi: 10.3201/eid0506.990602.

DOI:10.3201/eid0506.990602
PMID:10603207
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2640802/
Abstract

The development of vaccines against rare emerging infectious diseases is hampered by many disincentives. In the face of growing in-house expenditures associated with research and development projects in a complex legal and regulatory environment, most pharmaceutical companies prioritize their projects and streamline their product portfolio. Nevertheless, for humanitarian reasons, there is a need to develop niche vaccines for rare diseases not preventable or curable by other means. The U.S. Orphan Drug Act of 1983 and a similar proposal from the European Commission (currently under legislative approval) provide financial and practical incentives for the research and development of drugs to treat rare diseases. In addition, updated epidemiologic information from experts in the field of emerging diseases; increased disease awareness among health professionals, patients, and the general public; a list of priority vaccines; emergence of a dedicated organization with strong leadership; and the long-term pharmacoeconomic viability of orphan products will be key factors in overcoming the complexity of orphan status and the limited need for vaccine.

摘要

针对罕见新发传染病的疫苗研发受到诸多不利因素的阻碍。在复杂的法律和监管环境下,面对与研发项目相关的内部支出不断增加,大多数制药公司会对其项目进行优先级排序并精简产品组合。然而,出于人道主义原因,有必要开发针对那些无法通过其他手段预防或治愈的罕见疾病的小众疫苗。1983年美国的《孤儿药法案》以及欧盟委员会的一项类似提案(目前正在立法审批中)为治疗罕见疾病药物的研发提供了资金和实际激励。此外,来自新发疾病领域专家的最新流行病学信息;卫生专业人员、患者和公众对疾病认识的提高;优先疫苗清单;一个拥有强大领导力的专门组织的出现;以及孤儿产品的长期药物经济学可行性,都将是克服孤儿药地位的复杂性和疫苗需求有限这一问题的关键因素。

相似文献

1
Development of orphan vaccines: an industry perspective.孤儿疫苗的开发:行业视角
Emerg Infect Dis. 1999 Nov-Dec;5(6):749-56. doi: 10.3201/eid0506.990602.
2
A cross-national comparative study of orphan drug policies in the United States, the European Union, and Japan: towards a made-in-China orphan drug policy.中、美、欧、日均出台孤儿药政策,如何走出中国式孤儿药之路:跨国比较研究
J Public Health Policy. 2010 Dec;31(4):407-20; discussion 420-1. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2010.30.
3
"Creating hope" and other incentives for drug development for children.为儿童开发药物的“创造希望”和其他激励措施。
Sci Transl Med. 2011 Jan 19;3(66):66cm1. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3001707.
4
Rare diseases, orphan drugs and their regulation: questions and misconceptions.罕见病、孤儿药及其监管:问题与误区。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010 Dec;9(12):921-9. doi: 10.1038/nrd3275. Epub 2010 Nov 9.
5
A cross-national comparison of orphan drug policies: implications for the U.S. Orphan Drug Act.孤儿药政策的跨国比较:对美国《孤儿药法案》的影响
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1998 Apr;23(2):265-90. doi: 10.1215/03616878-23-2-265.
6
Orphan Drug Expenditures In The United States: A Historical And Prospective Analysis, 2007-18.美国孤儿药支出:2007 - 2018年的历史与前瞻性分析
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Sep 1;35(9):1588-94. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0030.
7
Do investors value the FDA orphan drug designation?投资者是否看重美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的孤儿药认定?
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 Jun 19;12(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0665-6.
8
Orphan drug development: an economically viable strategy for biopharma R&D.孤儿药开发:生物制药研发的经济可行策略。
Drug Discov Today. 2012 Jul;17(13-14):660-4. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
9
Evolution and current status of the Orphan Drug Act.《孤儿药法案》的演变与现状
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1992 Fall;8(4):573-82. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300002282.
10
[Authorization and reimbursement of orphan drugs in an international comparison].[国际比较中罕见病药物的授权与报销]
Gesundheitswesen. 2011 Aug;73(8-9):504-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262864. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Review: Understanding Rare Genetic Diseases in Low Resource Regions Like Jammu and Kashmir - India.综述:了解印度查谟和克什米尔等资源匮乏地区的罕见遗传病
Front Genet. 2020 Apr 30;11:415. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00415. eCollection 2020.
2
Willingness to pay for an Ebola vaccine during the 2014-2016 ebola outbreak in West Africa: Results from a U.S. National sample.在 2014-2016 年西非埃博拉疫情期间,美国人对埃博拉疫苗的支付意愿:一项美国全国性样本研究结果。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Jul 3;14(7):1665-1671. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2018.1423928. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
3
Chikungunya vaccines in development.正在研发的基孔肯雅疫苗。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Mar 3;12(3):716-31. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1101197.
4
Enzyme replacement therapy in orphan and ultra-orphan diseases: the limitations of standard economic metrics as exemplified by Fabry-Anderson disease.罕见病和超罕见病的酶替代疗法:以法布里-安德森病为例看标准经济指标的局限性
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(3):201-8. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725030-00003.
5
Cost-effectiveness of a potential vaccine for Coccidioides immitis.一种针对粗球孢子菌的潜在疫苗的成本效益。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2001 Sep-Oct;7(5):797-806. doi: 10.3201/eid0705.010505.

本文引用的文献

1
The introduction of new vaccines into developing countries.向发展中国家引进新疫苗。
Vaccine. 1999 Feb 26;17(7-8):646-52. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(98)00246-1.
2
Economic evaluations applied to HB vaccination: general observations.应用于乙肝疫苗接种的经济学评估:总体观察
Vaccine. 1998 Nov;16 Suppl:S84-92. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(98)00305-3.
3
Will ethical and liability issues and public acceptance allow maternal immunization?伦理和责任问题以及公众接受度会允许孕产妇免疫接种吗?
Vaccine. 1998 Aug-Sep;16(14-15):1482-5. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(98)80005-4.
4
Rare diseases and "orphan" drugs.罕见病与“孤儿”药。
Med J Aust. 1998 Jul 20;169(2):69-70. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb140184.x.
5
A cross-national comparison of orphan drug policies: implications for the U.S. Orphan Drug Act.孤儿药政策的跨国比较:对美国《孤儿药法案》的影响
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1998 Apr;23(2):265-90. doi: 10.1215/03616878-23-2-265.
6
Protective efficacy of a live attenuated vaccine against Argentine hemorrhagic fever. AHF Study Group.一种减毒活疫苗对阿根廷出血热的保护效力。阿根廷出血热研究小组。
J Infect Dis. 1998 Feb;177(2):277-83. doi: 10.1086/514211.
7
Prospects for the use of new vaccines in developing countries: cost is not the only impediment.在发展中国家使用新型疫苗的前景:成本并非唯一障碍。
Vaccine. 1996 Sep;14(13):1179-86. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(96)00024-2.
8
Setting priorities for the Children's Vaccine Initiative: a cost-effectiveness approach.为儿童疫苗倡议设定优先事项:一种成本效益方法。
Vaccine. 1995;13(8):707-14. doi: 10.1016/0264-410x(94)00063-s.
9
Orphan drugs: the question of products liability.
Am J Law Med. 1985 Winter;10(4):491-513.