• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

漏斗骨盆解剖结构与冲击波碎石术治疗下盏肾结石的结石清除情况

Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy.

作者信息

Gupta N P, Singh D V, Hemal A K, Mandal S

机构信息

Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Urol. 2000 Jan;163(1):24-7.

PMID:10604306
Abstract

PURPOSE

We evaluate the significance of inferior caliceal radiographic anatomy and determine its influence on successful fragmentation and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between November 1996 and February 1998, 88 patients and 90 renal units with single or multiple inferior caliceal calculi of all sizes and composition were treated with ESWL. The size, number and area of calculi, length and width of the stone bearing inferior calix and infundibulopelvic angle were determined on pretreatment excretory urography. The infundibulopelvic angle was measured by 2 methods using the angle between the inferior caliceal infundibular and ureteral axes (angle 1), and between the infundibular and ureteropelvic axes (angle 2). Cases with residual fragments not clearing within 6 months of satisfactory fragmentation after lithotripsy were considered failures.

RESULTS

Overall stone clearance at 6 months was achieved in about 72% of the renal units. Infundibular length was 30 mm. or less in 77% of successful cases and in 64% of failures. Similarly, the smallest infundibular width of 5 mm. or more was found in 75% of successful cases compared to 41% of failures. Angle 1 of 35 degrees or more was observed in 73% of cases with compared to 18% without clearance. Angle 2 of 45 degrees or more was seen in 71% of successful cases compared to 9% of failures. The chances of a patient becoming stone-free with all favorable criteria of infundibular length 30 mm. or less, infundibular width 5 mm. or greater and infundibular ureteropelvic angle 45 degrees or greater was 100% (23 patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiographic features of a stone bearing inferior calix and its relation to the renal pelvis can be easily measured on standard excretory urography. An infundibular width of 5 mm. or more and infundibulopelvic angle 1 of 35 degrees or more or angle 2 of 45 degrees or more were statistically significant factors of radiographic anatomy in stone clearance following ESWL. Inferior caliceal length was not statistically significant, although length of 30 mm. or less appeared to be more favorable for stone clearance. The ideal treatment of inferior caliceal calculi in patients with all 3 favorable criteria is ESWL.

摘要

目的

我们评估下盏的放射学解剖结构的意义,并确定其对体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)成功碎裂和清除下盏结石的影响。

材料与方法

1996年11月至1998年2月期间,88例患者的90个肾单位接受了ESWL治疗,这些肾单位存在各种大小和成分的单个或多个下盏结石。在治疗前的排泄性尿路造影上确定结石的大小、数量和面积,结石所在下盏的长度和宽度以及肾盂漏斗角。肾盂漏斗角通过两种方法测量,即下盏漏斗与输尿管轴之间的夹角(角度1),以及漏斗与输尿管肾盂轴之间的夹角(角度2)。碎石术后6个月内结石碎片未完全清除的病例被视为失败。

结果

6个月时约72%的肾单位实现了结石完全清除。77%的成功病例和64%的失败病例漏斗长度为30毫米或更短。同样,75%的成功病例漏斗最小宽度为等于或大于5毫米,而失败病例中这一比例为41%。结石清除的病例中73%观察到角度1为35度或更大,未清除的病例中这一比例为18%。成功病例中71%观察到角度2为45度或更大,失败病例中这一比例为9%。当漏斗长度为30毫米或更短、漏斗宽度为5毫米或更大且漏斗输尿管肾盂角为45度或更大这些所有有利标准都满足时,患者结石完全清除的几率为100%(23例患者)。

结论

在标准的排泄性尿路造影上可以很容易地测量结石所在下盏的放射学特征及其与肾盂的关系。漏斗宽度为5毫米或更大以及漏斗肾盂角1为35度或更大或角度2为45度或更大是ESWL术后结石清除的放射学解剖结构的统计学显著因素。下盏长度虽无统计学意义,但30毫米或更短的长度似乎更有利于结石清除。对于所有三个有利标准都满足的患者,下盏结石的理想治疗方法是ESWL。

相似文献

1
Infundibulopelvic anatomy and clearance of inferior caliceal calculi with shock wave lithotripsy.漏斗骨盆解剖结构与冲击波碎石术治疗下盏肾结石的结石清除情况
J Urol. 2000 Jan;163(1):24-7.
2
Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy.冲击波碎石术或输尿管镜检查术后下盏结石清除率:下极影像学解剖结构的影响
J Urol. 1998 Mar;159(3):676-82.
3
Lower pole caliceal stone clearance after ESWL: the effect of infundibulopelvic angle.体外冲击波碎石术后下极肾盏结石清除率:肾盂漏斗部角度的影响
J Med Assoc Thai. 1999 Sep;82(9):891-4.
4
The impact of caliceal pelvic anatomy on stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric lower pole stones.肾盂肾盏解剖结构对小儿下极结石冲击波碎石术后结石清除的影响。
J Urol. 2004 Sep;172(3):1082-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000135670.83076.5c.
5
Predictive factors of lower calyceal stone clearance after Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy (ESWL): a focus on the infundibulopelvic anatomy.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)后下盏结石清除的预测因素:聚焦于肾盂漏斗部解剖结构
Eur Urol. 2005 Aug;48(2):296-302; discussion 302. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.02.017. Epub 2005 Mar 9.
6
Does lower-pole caliceal anatomy predict stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for primary lower-pole nephrolithiasis?下极肾盏解剖结构能否预测原发性下极肾结石冲击波碎石术后的结石清除情况?
Urol Int. 2007;79(2):129-32. doi: 10.1159/000106325.
7
[Predictive factors of successful treatment of lower caliceal calculi with Edap LT02 extracorporeal lithotripsy].[Edap LT02体外冲击波碎石术成功治疗下盏结石的预测因素]
Prog Urol. 2000 Sep;10(4):529-36.
8
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower calyx calculi: how much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system?下盏结石的体外冲击波碎石术:集合系统的解剖结构对治疗结果有多大影响?
Eur Urol. 2007 Aug;52(2):539-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.058. Epub 2007 Mar 28.
9
Predictors of lower pole renal stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术后下极肾结石清除的预测因素
J Urol. 2002 Oct;168(4 Pt 1):1344-7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)64445-X.
10
[Caliceal stones:What did we learned after 10 years of ESWL (extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy)].
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2003 Jan-Mar;107(1):157-62.

引用本文的文献

1
The Saudi urological association guidelines on urolithiasis.沙特泌尿外科协会尿路结石指南。
Urol Ann. 2024 Jan-Mar;16(1):1-27. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_120_23. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
2
Kidney collecting system anatomy applied to endourology - a narrative review.肾脏收集系统解剖学在泌尿外科中的应用——叙述性综述。
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Mar-Apr;50(2):164-177. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2024.9901.
3
Endourological Options for Small (< 2 cm) Lower Pole Stones - Does the Lower Pole Angle Matter?经皮肾镜取石术治疗小(<2cm)下极结石的方法选择——下极角度重要吗?
Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Aug;24(8):365-370. doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01161-w. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
4
The impact of the pelvicalyceal anatomy characteristics on the prediction of flexible ureteroscopy outcomes.肾盂肾盏解剖特征对输尿管软镜检查结果预测的影响。
Urol Ann. 2021 Apr-Jun;13(2):105-110. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_19_20. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
5
Endoscopic treatment of lower pole stones: is a disposable ureteroscope preferable? Results of a prospective case-control study.下极结石的内镜治疗:一次性输尿管镜是否更优?一项前瞻性病例对照研究的结果
Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(3):280-284. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2019.1962. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
6
Revisiting the morphology of pelvicalyceal system in human cadaveric kidneys with a systematic review of literature.通过对文献的系统回顾重新审视人体尸体肾脏肾盂肾盏系统的形态学
Asian J Urol. 2019 Jul;6(3):249-255. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.12.006. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
7
Influence of the renal lower pole anatomy and mid-renal-zone classification in successful approach to the calices during flexible ureteroscopy.肾下极解剖结构及肾中区分类对输尿管软镜下成功进入肾盏的影响
Surg Radiol Anat. 2016 Apr;38(3):293-7. doi: 10.1007/s00276-015-1562-0. Epub 2015 Oct 6.
8
Lower pole anatomy and mid-renal-zone classification applied to flexible ureteroscopy: experimental study using human three-dimensional endocasts.应用于软性输尿管镜检查的下极解剖结构和肾中区分类:使用人体三维铸型的实验研究
Surg Radiol Anat. 2015 Dec;37(10):1243-9. doi: 10.1007/s00276-015-1503-y. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
9
Comparative Study of Lithotripsy and PCNL for 11-15 mm Lower Caliceal Calculi In Community Health Hospital.社区卫生医院中11 - 15毫米下盏结石的体外冲击波碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术的对比研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jun;8(6):HC12-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/6704.4502. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
10
Is the gravity effect of radiographic anatomic features enough to justify stone clearance or fragments retention following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL).放射解剖学特征的重力效应是否足以证明体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)后结石清除或碎片残留是合理的。
Urol Res. 2012 Aug;40(4):339-44. doi: 10.1007/s00240-011-0412-8. Epub 2011 Aug 17.