Suppr超能文献

类风湿关节炎早期患者自我报告的压痛和肿胀关节计数。西方执业风湿病学家联盟。

Patient self-report tender and swollen joint counts in early rheumatoid arthritis. Western Consortium of Practicing Rheumatologists.

作者信息

Wong A L, Wong W K, Harker J, Sterz M, Bulpitt K, Park G, Ramos B, Clements P, Paulus H

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, California 91326, USA.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 1999 Dec;26(12):2551-61.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the correlation between patient self-report joint counts and standard physician joint counts, and to compare pictorial (Mannequin) and text (Rapid Assessment of Disease Activity in Rheumatology, RADAR) formats for obtaining patient self-reports.

METHODS

Baseline patient self-report joint counts were mailed and completed by 60 patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) one day before and one day after being examined by a physician. Twenty-seven were randomized to the Mannequin tender and Mannequin swollen joint counts; 33 were randomized to the RADAR tender and swollen joint counts. Agreement between patient and physician self-report joint counts, diagnostic characteristics, and test-retest reliability of patient self-report joint counts was computed. Stepwise regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of patient-physician differences in total joint count.

RESULTS

Means and standard deviations of paired patient and physician total joint counts were not different for Mannequin or RADAR forms. Spearman correlations were moderate (0.58 to 0.69 for Mannequin, 0.37 to 0.58 for RADAR). Agreement (intraclass correlations) was 0.65 for the Mannequin and 0.56 for the RADAR forms. Patient test-retest reproducibility was moderate for RADAR tenderness (0.58) and high (r>0.90) for RADAR swollen and both Mannequin forms. Level of patient education predicted patient-physician differences on the RADAR swollen joint counts (p = 0.003), but was not significant in Mannequin forms, suggesting that education was not a factor in accurate completion of Mannequin forms.

CONCLUSION

Both pictorial and text format patient self-report joint counts are significantly correlated with physician joint counts. In addition to moderately high patient test-retest reproducibility, this suggests that patient self-reports in both formats may yield accurate measures of improvement in disease activity.

摘要

目的

确定患者自我报告的关节计数与标准医生关节计数之间的相关性,并比较用于获取患者自我报告的图片(人体模型)和文字(风湿病疾病活动快速评估,RADAR)形式。

方法

在医生检查前一天和检查后一天,向60例早期类风湿关节炎(RA)患者邮寄并让其完成基线患者自我报告的关节计数。27例被随机分配至人体模型压痛和人体模型肿胀关节计数组;33例被随机分配至RADAR压痛和肿胀关节计数组。计算患者与医生自我报告的关节计数之间的一致性、诊断特征以及患者自我报告关节计数的重测信度。进行逐步回归分析以确定患者与医生在总关节计数差异的预测因素。

结果

人体模型或RADAR形式的配对患者与医生总关节计数的均值和标准差无差异。Spearman相关性为中等(人体模型为0.58至0.69,RADAR为0.37至0.58)。人体模型形式的一致性(组内相关性)为0.65,RADAR形式为0.56。RADAR压痛的患者重测再现性为中等(0.58),RADAR肿胀和两种人体模型形式的重测再现性均较高(r>0.90)。患者教育水平可预测RADAR肿胀关节计数时患者与医生的差异(p = 0.003),但在人体模型形式中不显著,这表明教育不是准确完成人体模型形式的一个因素。

结论

图片和文字形式的患者自我报告关节计数均与医生关节计数显著相关。除了患者重测具有较高的再现性外,这表明两种形式的患者自我报告都可能得出疾病活动改善的准确测量结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验