Dijk D J, Duffy J F, Czeisler C A
Harvard Medical School, Boston.
J Sleep Res. 1992 Jun;1(2):112-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.1992.tb00021.x.
Circadian and sleep/wake dependent processes underlying variations in subjective alertness and cognitive performance were assessed in a constant routine protocol and in a protocol in which the sleep/wake cycle was uncoupled from the output of the endogenous circadian pacemaker. In the latter protocol, the contribution of a sleep/wake dependent process and a circadian process to alertness and performance were separated by folding the data at either the period of the sleep/wake cycle or at the period of the endogenous circadian body temperature rhythm. This analysis revealed that prior wakefulness within a range of 0-18 h significantly reduced alertness and performance and that the circadian rhythm of core body temperature paralleled the circadian rhythm of alertness and performance. During the first 16 h of the constant routine protocol, which coincided with the subjects' habitual period of wakefulness, alertness and performance remained at a stable level. The latter finding was explained by assuming that during our usual waking day the circadian system counteracts the detrimental effects of increasing duration of prior wakefulness.
在一项持续常规方案以及一项睡眠/觉醒周期与内源性昼夜节律起搏器输出解耦的方案中,评估了主观警觉性和认知表现变化背后的昼夜节律以及依赖睡眠/觉醒的过程。在后者的方案中,通过将数据在睡眠/觉醒周期的时段或内源性昼夜体温节律的时段进行折叠,分离了依赖睡眠/觉醒的过程和昼夜节律过程对警觉性和表现的贡献。该分析表明,0至18小时范围内的先前觉醒显著降低了警觉性和表现,并且核心体温的昼夜节律与警觉性和表现的昼夜节律平行。在持续常规方案的前16小时内,这与受试者习惯的觉醒时段一致,警觉性和表现保持在稳定水平。通过假设在我们通常的清醒日,昼夜节律系统抵消了先前觉醒持续时间增加的有害影响来解释后一发现。