Suppr超能文献

肿瘤抑制性1,2-双(磺酰基)肼与氯乙基亚硝脲产生的DNA损伤比较。

Comparison of DNA lesions produced by tumor-inhibitory 1,2-bis(sulfonyl)hydrazines and chloroethylnitrosoureas.

作者信息

Penketh P G, Shyam K, Sartorelli A C

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and Developmental Therapeutics Program, Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520, USA.

出版信息

Biochem Pharmacol. 2000 Feb 1;59(3):283-91. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(99)00328-7.

Abstract

1,2-Bis(sulfonyl)hydrazine derivatives, designed to generate several of the electrophilic species classically believed to be responsible for the alkylating (chloroethylating) and/or carbamoylating activities of the chloroethylnitrosoureas (CNUs), were compared with respect to the cross-linking and nicking of T7 DNA to that caused by 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU), 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea (CCNU), and 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-(4-trans-methylcyclohexyl)-1-nitrosourea (MeCCNU). In the case of BCNU, a large proportion of T7 DNA strand nicking was found to be due to the generation of 2-chloroethylamine, produced from the hydrolysis of 2-chloroethylisocyanate, in turn formed during the decomposition of the parental nitrosourea. 1,2-Bis(methylsulfonyl)-1-(2-chloroethyl)hydrazine (compound 1) gave a greater yield of DNA cross-links than the CNUs. Compound 1, as well as its derivatives that were incapable of generating 2-chloroethylisocyanate, did not produce detectable levels of strand nicking, indicating that N7-alkylation of guanine did not occur to a significant extent with these agents. Since compound 1 and its derivatives are believed to generate chloronium and chloroethyldiazonium ions, it would appear that these species could not be significantly involved in the N7-alkylation of guanine caused by the CNUs. The relatively low level of N7-alkylation of guanine residues and the relatively high yield of cross-links generated by some of the 1,2-bis(sulfonyl)-1-(2-chloroethyl)hydrazine derivatives implies that they are more exclusive O6-guanine chloroethylating agents than the CNUs. O6-Guanine chloroethylation is believed to be the therapeutically relevant event produced by the CNUs; therefore, compound 1 derivatives represent promising new cancer chemotherapeutic agents, since they appear to generate lower quantities of therapeutically unimportant, yet carcinogenic lesions, and more of the therapeutically relevant O6-guanine chloroethylation than the CNUs.

摘要

1,2 - 双(磺酰基)肼衍生物被设计用于产生几种传统上认为是导致氯乙基亚硝脲(CNUs)的烷基化(氯乙基化)和/或氨基甲酰化活性的亲电物质,并将其与1,3 - 双(2 - 氯乙基)-1 - 亚硝脲(BCNU)、1 - (2 - 氯乙基)-3 - 环己基 - 1 - 亚硝脲(CCNU)和1 - (2 - 氯乙基)-3 - (4 - 反式甲基环己基)-1 - 亚硝脲(MeCCNU)对T7 DNA的交联和切口情况进行了比较。就BCNU而言,发现很大一部分T7 DNA链切口是由于2 - 氯乙胺的产生,2 - 氯乙胺由2 - 氯乙基异氰酸酯水解产生,而2 - 氯乙基异氰酸酯又是在母体亚硝脲分解过程中形成的。1,2 - 双(甲基磺酰基)-1 - (2 - 氯乙基)肼(化合物1)产生的DNA交联产量比CNUs更高。化合物1及其不能产生2 - 氯乙基异氰酸酯的衍生物,没有产生可检测水平的链切口,这表明这些试剂对鸟嘌呤的N7 - 烷基化在很大程度上没有发生。由于化合物1及其衍生物被认为会产生氯鎓离子和氯乙基亚铵离子,那么似乎这些物质在由CNUs引起的鸟嘌呤N7 - 烷基化过程中不会起显著作用。鸟嘌呤残基的N7 - 烷基化水平相对较低,以及一些1,2 - 双(磺酰基)-1 - (2 - 氯乙基)肼衍生物产生的交联产量相对较高,这意味着它们比CNUs更具专一性的O6 - 鸟嘌呤氯乙基化剂。O6 - 鸟嘌呤氯乙基化被认为是CNUs产生的与治疗相关的事件;因此,化合物1的衍生物代表了有前景的新型癌症化疗药物,因为与CNUs相比,它们似乎产生的治疗上不重要但致癌的损伤数量更少,而产生的治疗上相关的O6 - 鸟嘌呤氯乙基化更多。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验