Hoppenreijs T J, Stoelinga P J, Grace K L, Robben C M
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999 Dec;28(6):411-8.
The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term treatment results of 26 patients who developed progressive condylar resorption (PCR) following a bilateral sagittal split advancement osteotomy (n= 19) or a bimaxillary osteotomy (n=7). PCR was diagnosed clinically and from a comparison of pre- and postoperative cephalometric and orthopantomographic radiographs. The preoperative condylar configuration and resorption pattern were assessed distinguishing between 'deep bite' and 'open bite'. Patients with 'deep bites' tended to have more resorption on the superior site of the condyle, while 'anterior open bites' often had resorption on the superior and anterior sites of the condyle. The patients were divided into 2 groups, one receiving non-surgical treatment that included splints, orthodontics with or without extractions and restorative dentistry. The second group underwent repeated surgery to treat skeletal relapse. Thirteen patients who underwent non-surgical treatment after orthognathic surgery had satisfactory results from orthodontic dental compensation, although only 3/13 had Class I occlusion. Another 13 patients had unacceptable occlusal and/or esthetic results and, therefore, underwent a second surgery. Following surgery, 7 patients had satisfactory occlusal and esthetic results and were skeletally stable. Four patients had 40-80% relapse, but with a stable occlusion. Two patients had 120% and 100% relapse, respectively, and needed a third surgical intervention. The first patient had a stable occlusal and esthetic result with approximately 30% relapse at pogonion, but the second patient still had an unstable malocclusion with again 100% relapse. It appeared that, without surgical intervention after PCR, further resorption ceased after approximately two years. Second surgery appeared to produce variable results, but, in this series, the majority had significant improvement.
本回顾性研究的目的是评估26例在双侧矢状劈开前徙截骨术(n = 19)或双颌截骨术(n = 7)后发生进行性髁突吸收(PCR)患者的长期治疗效果。通过临床诊断以及术前和术后头颅侧位片与曲面断层片的对比来诊断PCR。评估术前髁突形态和吸收模式,并区分“深覆合”和“开颌”。“深覆合”患者的髁突上部往往吸收更多,而“前牙开颌”患者的髁突上部和前部常常出现吸收。患者被分为两组,一组接受非手术治疗,包括使用咬合板、正畸治疗(有或无拔牙)以及修复牙科治疗。第二组接受反复手术以治疗骨骼复发。13例正颌手术后接受非手术治疗的患者通过正畸牙齿代偿取得了满意的效果,尽管只有3/13达到了I类咬合关系。另外13例患者的咬合和/或美观效果不理想,因此接受了二次手术。手术后,7例患者的咬合和美观效果满意,骨骼稳定。4例患者有40 - 80%的复发,但咬合稳定。2例患者分别有120%和100%的复发,需要第三次手术干预。第一例患者的咬合和美观效果稳定,颏点处约有30%的复发,但第二例患者仍然存在不稳定的错颌畸形,且再次复发率为100%。似乎在PCR后未经手术干预的情况下,大约两年后进一步的吸收停止。二次手术的效果似乎各不相同,但在本系列研究中大多数患者有显著改善。