Landry D J, Kaeser L, Richards C L
The Alan Guttmacher Institute.
Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Nov-Dec;31(6):280-6.
For more than two decades, abstinence from sexual intercourse has been promoted by some advocates as the central, if not sole, component of public school sexuality education policies in the United States. Little is known, however, about the extent to which policies actually focus on abstinence and about the relationship, at the local district level, between policies on teaching abstinence and policies on providing information about contraception.
A nationally representative sample of 825 public school district superintendents or their representatives completed a mailed questionnaire on sexuality education policies. Descriptive and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify districts that had sexuality education policies, their policy regarding abstinence education and the factors that influenced it.
Among the 69% of public school districts that have a district-wide policy to teach sexuality education, 14% have a comprehensive policy that treats abstinence as one option for adolescents in a broader sexuality education program; 51% teach abstinence as the preferred option for adolescents, but also permit discussion about contraception as an effective means of protecting against unintended pregnancy and disease (an abstinence-plus policy); and 35% (or 23% of all U.S. school districts) teach abstinence as the only option outside of marriage, with discussion of contraception either prohibited entirely or permitted only to emphasize its shortcomings (an abstinence-only policy). Districts in the South were almost five times as likely as those in the Northeast to have an abstinence-only policy. Among districts whose current policy replaced an earlier one, twice as many adopted a more abstinence-focused policy as moved in the opposite direction. Overall, though, there was no net increase among such districts in the number with an abstinence-only policy; instead, the largest change was toward abstinence-plus policies.
While a growing number of U.S. public school districts have made abstinence education a part of their curriculum, two-thirds of districts allow at least some positive discussion of contraception to occur. Nevertheless, one school district in three forbids dissemination of any positive information about contraception, regardless of whether their students are sexually active or at risk of pregnancy or disease.
二十多年来,一些倡导者一直在推动将禁欲作为美国公立学校性教育政策的核心内容,即便不是唯一内容。然而,对于这些政策实际关注禁欲的程度,以及在地方学区层面,禁欲教学政策与避孕信息提供政策之间的关系,我们却知之甚少。
对825名公立学校学区负责人或其代表进行了全国代表性抽样调查,他们通过邮寄问卷的方式完成了关于性教育政策的调查。进行了描述性和多变量分析,以确定拥有性教育政策的学区、其禁欲教育政策以及影响该政策的因素。
在制定了全学区性教育政策的69%的公立学校学区中,14%制定了全面政策,将禁欲作为更广泛的性教育计划中青少年的一种选择;51%将禁欲作为青少年的首选选项,但也允许讨论避孕是预防意外怀孕和疾病的有效手段(禁欲加政策);35%(即美国所有学区的23%)将禁欲作为婚姻之外的唯一选择,完全禁止或仅允许在强调其缺点的情况下讨论避孕(禁欲-only政策)。南部的学区实施禁欲-only政策的可能性几乎是东北部学区的五倍。在当前政策取代早期政策的学区中,采用更注重禁欲政策的学区数量是朝相反方向转变的学区数量的两倍。不过总体而言,此类学区中实施禁欲-only政策的数量并没有净增加;相反,最大变化是朝着禁欲加政策的方向。
虽然越来越多的美国公立学校学区将禁欲教育纳入课程,但三分之二的学区至少允许对避孕进行一些积极的讨论。然而,三分之一的学区禁止传播任何关于避孕的积极信息,无论其学生是否有性行为或有怀孕或患病风险。