Suppr超能文献

使用小型盘状人工瓣膜(美敦力霍尔)进行主动脉瓣置换术。

Aortic valve replacement with small-sized disc prostheses (medtronic hall).

作者信息

Brazao A J, Prieto D, de Oliveira J F, Eugenio L, Antunes M J

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

J Heart Valve Dis. 1999 Nov;8(6):680-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

Several studies have demonstrated a worse performance of small prostheses in the narrow aortic root. However, modern low-profile mechanical prostheses have improved hemodynamic performance, are easy to implant, and have been used increasingly in elderly patients, where narrow roots are most frequently observed. We describe our experience in patients with aortic annuli >21 mm with the use of Medtronic Hall prostheses.

METHODS

Between April 1988 and December 1997, a total of 332 patients (218 females, 114 males; mean age 59.3 +/- 9.8 years (range: 29-75 years) received Medtronic Hall size 20 (n = 140), 21 (n = 96) or 22 (n = 96) prostheses. The mean body surface area was 1.59 +/-0.12 m2 (range: 1.27-2.01 m2); 140 patients were in NYHA functional classes III/IV. There were no significant differences in clinical characteristics of patients in the three prosthesis-size groups.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative systolic left ventricular/aorta gradient was 64.5 +/- 24.8 mmHg (no significant inter-group difference). After cardiopulmonary bypass, peak gradients through the aortic prostheses were 13.9 +/- 8.0 mmHg in size 20 valves, 14.0 +/- 8.1 mmHg in size 21, and 10.1 +/- 8.9 mmHg in size 22. Four patients died in hospital (mortality rate 1.2%); there were no significant inter-group differences in hospital morbidity. Follow up was complete for 97% of the patients (mean 4.3 years; range: 1-11 years). The late mortality rate was 9.3% (n = 31; 2.56% per pt-yr); of these patients, 20 (14.3%) had size 20 prostheses, seven (7.3%) size 21, and four (4.2%) size 22 (p = 0.01). Fourteen patients (4.2%) died from cardiac causes, and six (1.8%) from prosthesis-related causes. Preoperative older age and aortic regurgitation were the only independent predictors of late mortality. Eight patients had systemic thromboembolic events (0.66% per pt-yr), two had prosthetic thrombosis (0.17% per pt-yr) and five had hemorrhagic episodes (0.41% per pt-yr). Seven patients had prosthetic valve endocarditis (0.58% per pt-yr). Among survivors, 97% are currently in NYHA class I/II.

CONCLUSIONS

The small (size 20, 21 and 22) Medtronic Hall prostheses have good hemodynamic performance and are an excellent option as valve substitutes in patients with narrow aortic roots.

摘要

研究背景与目的

多项研究表明,小型人工瓣膜在狭窄主动脉根部的性能较差。然而,现代低轮廓机械人工瓣膜改善了血流动力学性能,易于植入,且越来越多地用于老年患者,而老年患者中主动脉根部狭窄最为常见。我们描述了使用美敦力霍尔人工瓣膜治疗主动脉瓣环大于21mm患者的经验。

方法

1988年4月至1997年12月,共有332例患者(218例女性,114例男性;平均年龄59.3±9.8岁(范围:29 - 75岁)接受了美敦力霍尔型号20(n = 140)、21(n = 96)或22(n = 96)的人工瓣膜。平均体表面积为1.59±0.12 m²(范围:1.27 - 2.01 m²);140例患者处于纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能III/IV级。三个瓣膜尺寸组患者的临床特征无显著差异。

结果

术前左心室/主动脉平均收缩期压差为64.5±24.8 mmHg(组间无显著差异)。体外循环后,20号瓣膜通过主动脉人工瓣膜的峰值压差为13.9±8.0 mmHg,21号为14.0±8.1 mmHg,22号为10.1±8.9 mmHg。4例患者在住院期间死亡(死亡率1.2%);组间住院发病率无显著差异。97%的患者完成了随访(平均4.3年;范围:1 - 11年)。晚期死亡率为9.3%(n = 31;每年每患者2.56%);其中,20例(14.3%)使用20号人工瓣膜,7例(7.3%)使用21号,4例(4.2%)使用22号(p = 0.01)。14例患者(4.2%)死于心脏原因,6例(1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验