Suppr超能文献

将临床试验结果推广至实际医疗实践:氯吡格雷预防血管事件治疗的实例。CAPRA(氯吡格雷实际医疗实践率分析)研究小组。缺血性事件高危患者中氯吡格雷与阿司匹林的比较。

Generalizing the results of clinical trials to actual practice: the example of clopidogrel therapy for the prevention of vascular events. CAPRA (CAPRIE Actual Practice Rates Analysis) Study Group. Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events.

作者信息

Caro J J, Migliaccio-Walle K

机构信息

Caro Research, Concord, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1999 Dec;107(6):568-72. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00295-8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

An important element in translating the results obtained in clinical trials of a new treatment to clinical practice is the estimated event rate in patients who would be eligible to receive that treatment. We estimated the effect of clopidogrel, compared with aspirin, in actual practice using the relative risk reduction observed in the Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischaemic Events (CAPRIE) trial.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Ischemic event rates were estimated for 12,931 aspirin users drawn from the Saskatchewan Health population between 1990 and 1995 who had an index diagnosis of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or peripheral arterial disease. To estimate the absolute risk reduction, the 8.7% relative risk reduction from clopidogrel compared with aspirin that was observed in CAPRIE was applied to these rates.

RESULTS

The rates of ischemic events were greater in actual practice than among the control patients in the CAPRIE trial. In the Saskatchewan population, patients experienced an outcome event (myocardial infarction, stroke including intracranial hemorrhage, or death) at a rate of 15.9 per 100 patient-years, compared with only 6.9 per 100 patient-years in CAPRIE. If the same 8.7% relative risk reduction seen in the CAPRIE trial is also true for patients seen in routine clinical practice, the greater absolute risk in actual practice would reduce the number needed to treat to prevent one event from 200 patients to 70 patients.

CONCLUSION

Absolute risk rates may be substantially greater in clinical practice than in the selected patients enrolled in randomized trials. As a result, similar reductions in relative risk, if true for clinical practice, may yield substantially more benefit in clinical practice than in randomized trials.

摘要

目的

将新疗法临床试验结果应用于临床实践的一个重要因素是符合接受该疗法条件的患者的估计事件发生率。我们利用在缺血性事件高危患者中进行的氯吡格雷与阿司匹林比较研究(CAPRIE)试验中观察到的相对风险降低率,来估计氯吡格雷与阿司匹林相比在实际临床实践中的效果。

对象与方法

从1990年至1995年萨斯喀彻温省健康人群中选取12931名曾被诊断为心肌梗死、缺血性中风或外周动脉疾病的阿司匹林使用者,对其缺血事件发生率进行估计。为了估计绝对风险降低率,将CAPRIE试验中观察到的氯吡格雷相对于阿司匹林8.7%的相对风险降低率应用于这些发生率。

结果

实际临床实践中的缺血事件发生率高于CAPRIE试验中的对照患者。在萨斯喀彻温省人群中,患者发生结局事件(心肌梗死、包括颅内出血的中风或死亡)的发生率为每100患者年15.9例,而在CAPRIE试验中仅为每100患者年6.9例。如果CAPRIE试验中观察到的8.7%相对风险降低率在常规临床实践中的患者中同样适用,那么实际临床实践中更高的绝对风险将使预防一例事件所需治疗的患者数从200例降至70例。

结论

临床实践中的绝对风险率可能比随机试验中入选的特定患者的风险率高得多。因此,类似的相对风险降低率(如果在临床实践中适用)在临床实践中可能比在随机试验中产生更多益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验