Paciaroni M, Bogousslavsky J
Service de Neurologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Cerebrovasc Dis. 1999 Sep-Oct;9(5):253-60. doi: 10.1159/000015975.
Ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction and peripheral arterial disease are different clinical manifestations commonly due to the same underlying disease, i.e. atherosclerosis with subsequent thrombosis/embolism (atherothrombosis). Many clinical trials of secondary prevention after stroke or TIA have evaluated the benefit of long-term use of antiplatelet drugs in reducing the risk of subsequent vascular events. Aspirin and triclopidine have been shown to be effective in placebo-controlled studies for the composite outcome of stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death. Contrasting with these benefits, there were potentially serious, though rare, adverse effects. These considerations certainly justify the development of new antiplatelet agents. Clopidogrel is a new ADP-receptor antagonist, with a greater activity in animal models of thrombosis. CAPRIE (Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at Risk of Ischemic Events) was a randomized, blinded, international trial designed to assess the relative efficacy of clopidogrel and aspirin in reducing the risk of the outcome cluster of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death, as well as to assess their relative safety. 19,185 patients were recruited. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that the relative risk reduction was 8.7% (95% CI 0.3-16.5, p = 0.043) in favor of clopidogrel from an overall annual event rate of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or vascular death, ranging from 5.83% in the aspirin group to 5.33% in the clopidogrel group. The percentage of adverse events reported was higher in the aspirin group for all categories except rash, diarrhea, and abnormal liver function. It seems likely that clopidogrel will replace ticlopidine for stroke prevention, because of its better safety profile, and comparable efficacy. Clopidogrel probably will not replace aspirin as the first line therapy for many clinicians because of its higher cost and lack of widespread experience. However, other clinicians have already decided that they will use clopidogrel as first choice, because of the significant advantage over aspirin demonstrated in the CAPRIE study.
缺血性中风、心肌梗死和外周动脉疾病是常见的不同临床表现,通常由相同的基础疾病引起,即动脉粥样硬化伴随后续血栓形成/栓塞(动脉粥样硬化血栓形成)。许多中风或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)后的二级预防临床试验评估了长期使用抗血小板药物在降低后续血管事件风险方面的益处。在安慰剂对照研究中,阿司匹林和噻氯匹定已被证明对中风、心肌梗死或血管性死亡的复合结局有效。与这些益处形成对比的是,存在潜在严重但罕见的不良反应。这些考虑因素无疑为新型抗血小板药物的研发提供了依据。氯吡格雷是一种新型二磷酸腺苷(ADP)受体拮抗剂,在血栓形成动物模型中具有更强的活性。“氯吡格雷与阿司匹林在缺血事件高危患者中的应用比较研究(CAPRIE)”是一项随机、双盲、国际试验,旨在评估氯吡格雷和阿司匹林在降低缺血性中风、心肌梗死或血管性死亡结局组风险方面的相对疗效,并评估它们的相对安全性。招募了19185名患者。意向性分析表明,从缺血性中风、心肌梗死或血管性死亡的总体年事件发生率来看,氯吡格雷的相对风险降低了8.7%(95%置信区间0.3 - 16.5,p = 0.043),阿司匹林组的总体年事件发生率为5.83%,氯吡格雷组为5.33%。除皮疹、腹泻和肝功能异常外,阿司匹林组报告的所有类别不良事件百分比均较高。由于氯吡格雷具有更好的安全性和相当的疗效,它似乎有可能取代噻氯匹定用于预防中风。由于氯吡格雷成本较高且缺乏广泛的使用经验,对于许多临床医生来说,它可能不会取代阿司匹林作为一线治疗药物。然而,其他临床医生已经决定将氯吡格雷作为首选,因为在CAPRIE研究中它相对于阿司匹林具有显著优势。