Terling T
University of Oklahoma, Norman 73019, USA.
Child Abuse Negl. 1999 Dec;23(12):1359-70. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(99)00103-9.
Since the 1980s Child Protective Services has increasingly relied on family reunification for abused/neglected children rather than long term foster care or adoption. While family reunification practices are controversial, little research is available to inform the debate. This research explores the efficacy of these practices.
This study utilizes two CPS data sources and both quantitative and qualitative methodologies to identify reentry rates and correlates of reentry for abused and neglected children returned to their families by CPS.
System reentry due to additional maltreatment is considerable. Thirty-seven percent of the children reunited with their families reenter the system within 3 1/2 years. Correlates of reentry are identified as; abuse type, CPS history, parental competency, race, criminal history, substance abuse, and social support. Notably, assessments of risk made by caseworkers are found to be unrelated to reentry.
The high reentry rate and the limitations of current risk assessment procedures suggest that CPS family reunification practices have not been entirely successful. The identification of specific risks of reentry, such as those revealed in this study, will be helpful in assessing risk on cases. In addition, future studies should explore the systemic deficiencies that contribute to the additional maltreatment that occurs for a sizable proportion of the children served by the system.
自20世纪80年代以来,儿童保护服务机构越来越依赖让受虐待/忽视的儿童与家人团聚,而非长期寄养或收养。虽然家庭团聚做法存在争议,但可供参考以助于这场辩论的研究却很少。本研究探讨这些做法的成效。
本研究利用两个儿童保护服务机构的数据源以及定量和定性方法,来确定重新进入该系统的比率以及儿童保护服务机构送回其家庭的受虐待和被忽视儿童再次进入该系统的相关因素。
因再次遭受虐待而重新进入该系统的情况相当严重。与家人团聚的儿童中有37%在3年半内再次进入该系统。再次进入该系统的相关因素被确定为:虐待类型、儿童保护服务机构的记录、父母能力、种族、犯罪记录、药物滥用和社会支持。值得注意的是,发现个案工作者所做的风险评估与再次进入该系统无关。
高再次进入率和当前风险评估程序的局限性表明,儿童保护服务机构的家庭团聚做法并非完全成功。确定再次进入该系统的具体风险,比如本研究中揭示的那些风险,将有助于评估个案的风险。此外,未来的研究应探讨导致该系统所服务的相当一部分儿童再次遭受虐待的系统性缺陷。