Bui K Q, Banevicius M A, Nightingale C H, Quintiliani R, Nicolau D P
Department of Pharmacy Research, Office of Research Administration and Division of Infectious Diseases, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06102, USA.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000 Jan;45(1):57-62. doi: 10.1093/jac/45.1.57.
Recent in vitro and in vivo data have substantiated the beneficial effects of macrolides/ azalides for use against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. While macrolides/azalides are not very potent in vitro antimicrobial agents against this pathogen, they appear to have an adjunctive role by either altering the course of infection owing to their inhibition of biofilm production or modulation of the host anti-inflammatory response, or both. To determine the in vitro and in vivo effects of clarithromycin as adjunctive therapy with ceftazidime against a mucoidproducing strain of P. aeruginosa, we performed a standard time-kill experiment and a pneumonia model in mice, respectively. Time-kill studies were performed over a 24 h period with varying concentrations of clarithromycin and ceftazidime alone or in combination. Synergic activity was noted with the use of 0.5 x MIC of ceftazidime combined with either 0.5 or 2 x MIC of clarithromycin. Neutropenic mice were infected with 10(8) cfu of mucoid P. aeruginosa intranasally to produce pneumonia and subsequently treated with oral clarithromycin (100 mg/kg) and/or sc ceftazidime (1500 mg/kg) as monotherapy or in combination. The addition of 5 days of clarithromycin to the ceftazidime regimen significantly improved survival as compared with the beta-lactam alone (48% versus 32%, P = 0.04). While a statistically significant difference was not detected with the addition of 3 days of clarithromycin therapy, a trend towards improved survival was noted with this regimen (38% versus 32%). These data demonstrate the adjunctive potential of clarithromycin when administered in combination with an antipseudomonal agent for the treatment of mucoid-producing Pseudomonas in acute respiratory infection.
近期的体外和体内数据证实了大环内酯类/氮杂内酯类药物对铜绿假单胞菌的有益作用。虽然大环内酯类/氮杂内酯类药物在体外对该病原体的抗菌活性不强,但它们似乎具有辅助作用,要么通过抑制生物膜形成改变感染进程,要么调节宿主的抗炎反应,或者两者兼具。为了确定克拉霉素作为头孢他啶辅助治疗对产黏液铜绿假单胞菌菌株的体外和体内效果,我们分别进行了标准时间杀菌实验和小鼠肺炎模型实验。在24小时内,使用不同浓度的克拉霉素和头孢他啶单独或联合进行时间杀菌研究。当使用0.5倍最低抑菌浓度(MIC)的头孢他啶与0.5倍或2倍MIC的克拉霉素联合使用时,观察到协同活性。中性粒细胞减少的小鼠经鼻内感染10⁸cfu的产黏液铜绿假单胞菌以诱发肺炎,随后分别接受口服克拉霉素(100mg/kg)和/或皮下注射头孢他啶(1500mg/kg)作为单一疗法或联合疗法。与单独使用β-内酰胺类药物相比,在头孢他啶治疗方案中添加5天的克拉霉素可显著提高生存率(48%对32%,P = 0.04)。虽然添加3天克拉霉素治疗未检测到统计学上的显著差异,但该方案有提高生存率的趋势(38%对32%)。这些数据表明,克拉霉素与抗假单胞菌药物联合使用时,在治疗急性呼吸道感染中产黏液假单胞菌方面具有辅助治疗潜力。