Aitken L M
Canberra Hospital, Woden, Australia.
Am J Crit Care. 2000 Jan;9(1):43-51.
Monitoring of pulmonary artery pressure is an essential component of the care of critically ill patients. The conditions under which reliable measurements can be obtained must be clarified.
To determine (1) whether reliable measurements of pulmonary artery pressure can be obtained with patients in the right or left 60 degrees lateral position and (2) which characteristics of patients preclude obtaining reliable measurements.
One hundred five patients (65 cardiac surgery, 40 general medicine) with pulmonary artery catheters were enrolled in a prospective, stratified, quasi-experimental study. Subjects were repositioned from supine (head of bed elevated < 30 degrees with 1 pillow) to the left and right 60 degrees lateral positions. Systolic, diastolic, and mean pulmonary artery pressures and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were measured before and 5, 10, and 20 minutes after lateral repositioning. The zero reference was the phlebostatic axis when patients were supine and the dependent midclavicular line at the level of the fourth intercostal space when patients were in the lateral positions.
In most patients, measurements obtained with patients in the lateral position differed significantly from measurements obtained with patients supine. None of the variables examined were reliable predictors of which patients would have these differences. More than 11% of the patients had clinically significant differences in addition to the statistically significant differences.
Reliable measurements of pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure cannot be obtained with patients in the 60 degrees lateral position.
监测肺动脉压是危重症患者护理的重要组成部分。必须明确能够获得可靠测量值的条件。
确定(1)患者处于右侧或左侧60度侧卧位时能否获得可靠的肺动脉压测量值,以及(2)哪些患者特征会妨碍获得可靠测量值。
105例置入肺动脉导管的患者(65例心脏外科手术患者,40例普通内科患者)纳入一项前瞻性、分层、准实验研究。受试者从仰卧位(床头抬高<30度,垫1个枕头)重新调整为左侧和右侧60度侧卧位。在侧卧位重新调整前以及调整后5、10和20分钟测量收缩压、舒张压、平均肺动脉压和肺毛细血管楔压。仰卧位时零参考点为静脉压轴,侧卧位时为第四肋间水平的锁骨中线。
在大多数患者中,侧卧位患者获得的测量值与仰卧位患者获得的测量值有显著差异。所检查的变量均不能可靠预测哪些患者会出现这些差异。除了统计学上的显著差异外,超过11%的患者存在临床显著差异。
患者处于60度侧卧位时无法获得可靠的肺动脉压和肺毛细血管楔压测量值。