Eskinazi D, Muehsam D
Rosenthal Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, USA.
Altern Ther Health Med. 2000 Jan;6(1):49-53.
The documented prevalence of alternative medicine practices in the United States warrants a critical evaluation of this field. Although adequate scientific evaluation is needed, it is doubtful that such research will take place unless other factors are taken into account that remain overlooked. We have previously proposed a conceptual definition of alternative medicine practices and outlined those sociological, political, economic, and regulatory factors independent of the alternative healthcare community that could potentially hamper the optimal evaluation of alternative medicine. In the present article, we discuss other relevant issues to which the alternative healthcare community contributes. These factors originate both from within biomedicine (e.g., demands for specific scientific approaches, explanatory models) and within the alternative medicine community itself (e.g., the use of jargon, insularity, a profit-minded research agenda).
在美国,有记录的替代医学实践的流行程度值得对该领域进行批判性评估。尽管需要进行充分的科学评估,但令人怀疑的是,除非考虑到其他被忽视的因素,否则此类研究是否会开展。我们之前已经提出了替代医学实践的概念性定义,并概述了那些独立于替代医疗社区的社会学、政治、经济和监管因素,这些因素可能会阻碍对替代医学的最佳评估。在本文中,我们讨论替代医疗社区所涉及的其他相关问题。这些因素既源于生物医学内部(例如对特定科学方法、解释模型的要求),也源于替代医学社区本身(例如行话的使用、与世隔绝、以盈利为目的的研究议程)。