Stevens T P, Sinkin R A, Hall C B, Maniscalco W M, McConnochie K M
Division of Neonatology, Children's Hospital at Strong University of Rochester, NY, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Jan;154(1):55-61.
To assess the risk of hospitalization associated with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and to estimate the economic impact of RSV prophylaxis with either RSV immune globulin (RSV-Ig) or RSV monoclonal antibody (palivizumab) on a cohort of preterm infants born at 32 weeks' gestation or earlier.
Historical cohort study.
A 12-county neonatal network served by the regional center in Rochester, NY.
One thousand twenty-nine infants born at 32 weeks' gestation or earlier followed up until 1 year of corrected age.
Rate of hospitalization with an RSV-associated illness; cost per hospitalization prevented resulting from either form of RSV prophylaxis.
The probability of hospitalization with an RSV-associated illness for infants born at 32 weeks' gestation or earlier was estimated at 11.2%. The incidence of RSV hospitalization increased with decreasing gestational age (13.9% vs 4.4% for infants born at < or =26 weeks' gestation vs those born at 30-32 weeks' gestation). Infants requiring respiratory support at 36 weeks of postconceptual age (PCA) or older had a higher hospitalization rate (16.8% vs 6.2%), longer hospital stays, and higher hospital charges than infants requiring respiratory support at less than 36 weeks of PCA. For infants requiring respiratory support at less than 36 weeks of PCA, the incidence of RSV hospitalization still increased with decreasing gestational age (10.2% vs 4.3% for infants < or =26 weeks' gestation vs those 30-32 weeks' gestation). Analysis indicated that both forms of RSV prophylaxis would increase the net cost of care for all groups. Palivizumab was more cost-effective than RSV-Ig for preventing RSV hospitalization among infants who required respiratory support at less than 36 weeks of PCA, especially those born at 26 weeks' gestation or earlier. Overall, RSV-Ig was more cost-effective than palivizumab for infants requiring respiratory support at 36 weeks of PCA or older.
This analysis suggests that available forms of RSV prophylaxis would increase the net cost of care not only for the entire cohort but for each of the subgroups studied. However, the RSV hospitalization rate and the cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis varied markedly by subgroup.
评估与呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)相关的住院风险,并估计使用RSV免疫球蛋白(RSV-Ig)或RSV单克隆抗体(帕利珠单抗)对一组妊娠32周或更早出生的早产儿进行RSV预防的经济影响。
历史队列研究。
纽约罗切斯特地区中心服务的一个12县新生儿网络。
1029名妊娠32周或更早出生的婴儿,随访至矫正年龄1岁。
RSV相关疾病的住院率;两种RSV预防形式导致的每次预防住院的成本。
妊娠32周或更早出生的婴儿因RSV相关疾病住院的概率估计为11.2%。RSV住院发生率随胎龄降低而增加(胎龄小于或等于26周的婴儿与30-32周出生的婴儿相比,住院率分别为13.9%和4.4%)。孕龄36周或更大时需要呼吸支持的婴儿住院率更高(16.8%对6.2%),住院时间更长,住院费用更高,高于孕龄小于36周时需要呼吸支持的婴儿。对于孕龄小于36周时需要呼吸支持的婴儿,RSV住院发生率仍随胎龄降低而增加(胎龄小于或等于26周的婴儿与30-32周出生的婴儿相比,住院率分别为10.2%和4.3%)。分析表明,两种RSV预防形式都会增加所有组的护理净成本。在孕龄小于36周时需要呼吸支持的婴儿中,尤其是胎龄26周或更早出生的婴儿,帕利珠单抗在预防RSV住院方面比RSV-Ig更具成本效益。总体而言,对于孕龄36周或更大时需要呼吸支持的婴儿,RSV-Ig比帕利珠单抗更具成本效益。
该分析表明,现有的RSV预防形式不仅会增加整个队列的护理净成本,还会增加所研究的每个亚组的护理净成本。然而,RSV住院率和预防的成本效益在亚组间有显著差异。