Marchetti A, Lau H, Magar R, Wang L, Devercelli G
Health Economics Research, Physicians World Communications Group, Secaucus, New Jersey 07094, USA.
Clin Ther. 1999 Apr;21(4):752-66. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(00)88326-5.
In its clinical assessment of the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-specific monoclonal antibody palivizumab, the IMpact-RSV Study Group demonstrated a reduction in hospitalizations for RSV-related lower respiratory tract infection in infants who received prophylaxis compared with infants who did not receive prophylaxis. An assessment of the RSV-related expenses for managing both groups of infants is needed to provide insight into the value of prophylaxis. The present study was conducted to identify and compare RSV-related health care expenditures incurred by infants who did not receive prophylaxis throughout one RSV season and after. Using a decision-analytic model populated with data from the contemporary medical literature, a pharmacoeconomic study was conducted from the perspective of the payer. Probabilities for RSV-related hospitalizations of infants who did and did not receive prophylaxis were abstracted from several published studies. Components of inpatient and outpatient care were identified through examination of hospital records, reviews of the published literature, and consultation with expert clinicians. Charges related to prophylaxis and medical management of infection were abstracted from hospital billing records and published data. Appropriate charges were applied to decision-tree branches and multiplied by in-line probabilities for outcomes. Products at terminal nodes were summed to establish total expected charges for both groups of infants. Widespread clinical use of prophylactic palivizumab would result in incremental expenses < or =$3459 per infant or cost savings < or =$39,107 per infant. The variability in value of prophylaxis derives from the rate of RSV-related hospitalizations in the community and the total health care expense of managing infected infants.
在对呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)特异性单克隆抗体帕利珠单抗的临床评估中,IMpact-RSV研究组表明,与未接受预防治疗的婴儿相比,接受预防治疗的婴儿因RSV相关下呼吸道感染而住院的人数有所减少。需要对两组婴儿的RSV相关管理费用进行评估,以深入了解预防治疗的价值。本研究旨在确定并比较在一个RSV季节及之后未接受预防治疗的婴儿所产生的RSV相关医疗保健费用。使用一个填充了当代医学文献数据的决策分析模型,从支付方的角度进行了一项药物经济学研究。接受和未接受预防治疗的婴儿发生RSV相关住院的概率取自多项已发表的研究。通过检查医院记录、查阅已发表的文献以及咨询专家临床医生,确定了住院和门诊护理的组成部分。与预防治疗和感染医疗管理相关的费用取自医院账单记录和已发表的数据。将适当的费用应用于决策树分支,并乘以结果的相关概率。对终端节点的乘积求和,以确定两组婴儿的总预期费用。预防性使用帕利珠单抗的广泛临床应用将导致每名婴儿的增量费用≤3459美元,或每名婴儿节省费用≤39107美元。预防治疗价值的差异源于社区中RSV相关住院率以及管理感染婴儿的总医疗保健费用。