Hasty M, Schrager J, Wrenn K
Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-4700, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Dec;14(12):756-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.04099.x.
The purpose of this study was to compare physicians' perceptions about managed care restrictions on drug prescribing with objective measures of the restrictions' effects. When asked a general question, 17 emergency medicine physicians in one urban, university hospital answered that they had to prescribe an antibiotic that was not their first choice because of managed care restrictions 32% of the time. The actual frequency of prescribing other than first-choice antibiotics, which was determined by asking the same physicians about the prescription of specific antibiotics for specific patients seen recently in the emergency department, was 6% ( p <.0001). We conclude that emergency medicine physicians treating patients in one managed care system significantly overestimated the restrictions imposed by managed care formularies on their antibiotic prescribing practices. Additional studies are warranted to measure the extent of this bias.
本研究的目的是比较医生对管理式医疗对药物处方限制的看法与这些限制效果的客观衡量指标。当被问及一个一般性问题时,一家城市大学医院的17名急诊医学医生回答说,由于管理式医疗的限制,他们有32%的时间不得不开具并非他们首选的抗生素。通过询问这些医生关于他们最近在急诊科为特定患者开具特定抗生素的处方情况来确定的非首选抗生素实际处方频率为6%(p<.0001)。我们得出结论,在一个管理式医疗系统中治疗患者的急诊医学医生显著高估了管理式医疗处方集对其抗生素处方行为的限制。有必要进行更多研究来衡量这种偏差的程度。