Raethjen J, Lindemann M, Schmaljohann H, Wenzelburger R, Pfister G, Deuschl G
Department of Neurology, University of Kiel, Germany.
Mov Disord. 2000 Jan;15(1):84-94. doi: 10.1002/1531-8257(200001)15:1<84::aid-mds1014>3.0.co;2-k.
The tremors of Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET) are traditionally considered to depend on a central oscillator producing rhythmic activation of the motoneurones of all extremities. To test this hypothesis, we have compared electromyographic tremor activity in different muscles of the affected limbs using cross spectral analysis, including coherence and phase. Surface electromyographic recordings from both arms, legs, and the neck were analyzed in 22 patients with PD and 28 patients with ET. Volume conduction between neighboring muscles producing artificial "coherence" has been found to be an important methodologic problem. We have developed a mathematical test to exclude data that could distort the results. According to this test, 10% or 25% of muscle combinations from the same limb had to be excluded from further analysis in PD or ET, respectively. In both, patients with PD and ET, we found a considerable number of muscle combinations oscillating at virtually the same frequency (delta frequency <0.4 Hz) without showing a significant coherence. Thus, the frequency difference between different muscles is not sufficient to measure the correlation between two muscles. Significant coherencies between muscles within the same arm or leg were found in 70% or 90% of patients with PD or ET, respectively, whereas only one patient with PD and not a single patient with ET showed significant coherencies between muscles from different limbs. The phase between coherent muscles of the same arm of patients with PD showed a preference of either a reciprocal alternating pattern for antagonistic muscles in forearm flexor and upper arm extensor as opposed to a co-contraction pattern between the hand flexors and the triceps brachii. In patients with ET such clear differences were lacking. We conclude that multiple oscillators are responsible for the tremor in different extremities of patients with PD and ET. Differences between PD and ET concerning the phase relation within the arm may either be related to the topography within the basal ganglia or to differently involved-spinal pathways.
帕金森病(PD)和特发性震颤(ET)的震颤传统上被认为依赖于一个中枢振荡器,该振荡器对所有肢体的运动神经元产生节律性激活。为了验证这一假设,我们使用互谱分析,包括相干性和相位,比较了受累肢体不同肌肉的肌电图震颤活动。对22例帕金森病患者和28例特发性震颤患者的双臂、双腿和颈部进行了表面肌电图记录分析。已发现相邻肌肉之间产生人为“相干性”的容积传导是一个重要的方法学问题。我们开发了一种数学测试来排除可能扭曲结果的数据。根据该测试,在帕金森病或特发性震颤患者中,分别必须从同一肢体的10%或25%的肌肉组合中排除进一步分析。在帕金森病和特发性震颤患者中,我们都发现相当数量的肌肉组合以几乎相同的频率(δ频率<0.4Hz)振荡,但没有显示出显著的相干性。因此,不同肌肉之间的频率差异不足以测量两块肌肉之间的相关性。在70%的帕金森病患者或90%的特发性震颤患者中,分别在同一手臂或腿部的肌肉之间发现了显著的相干性,而只有1例帕金森病患者且没有1例特发性震颤患者在不同肢体的肌肉之间显示出显著的相干性。帕金森病患者同一手臂相干肌肉之间的相位在前臂屈肌和上臂伸肌的拮抗肌中表现出相互交替模式的偏好,而不是手部屈肌和肱三头肌之间的共同收缩模式。在特发性震颤患者中缺乏这种明显差异。我们得出结论,多个振荡器导致帕金森病和特发性震颤患者不同肢体的震颤。帕金森病和特发性震颤在手臂内相位关系方面的差异可能与基底神经节内的地形有关,也可能与不同涉及的脊髓通路有关。