McHaffie H E, Cuttini M, Brölz-Voit G, Randag L, Mousty R, Duguet A M, Wennergren B, Benciolini P
University of Edinburgh, Scotland.
J Med Ethics. 1999 Dec;25(6):440-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.25.6.440.
Representatives from eight European countries compared the legal, ethical and professional settings within which decision making for neonates takes place. When it comes to limiting treatment there is general agreement across all countries that overly aggressive treatment is to be discouraged. Nevertheless, strong emphasis has been placed on the need for compassionate care even where cure is not possible. Where a child will die irrespective of medical intervention, there is widespread acceptance of the practice of limiting aggressive treatment or alleviating suffering even if death may be hastened as a result. Where the infant could be saved but the future outlook is bleak there is more debate, but only two countries have tested the courts with such cases. When it comes to the active intentional ending of life, the legal position is standard across Europe; it is prohibited. However, recognising those intractable situations where death may be lingering and unpleasant, Dutch paediatricians have reported that they do sometimes assist babies to die with parental consent. Two cases have been tried through the courts and recent official recommendations have set out standards by which such actions may be assessed.
来自八个欧洲国家的代表比较了新生儿决策所处的法律、伦理和专业环境。在限制治疗方面,所有国家普遍达成共识,即不鼓励过度积极的治疗。然而,即便无法治愈,也一直强烈强调给予关怀护理的必要性。如果无论医疗干预如何孩子都会死亡,那么即便这样做可能会加速死亡,限制积极治疗或减轻痛苦的做法也得到广泛认可。如果婴儿本可挽救但未来前景黯淡,则存在更多争议,但只有两个国家就此类案件诉诸法庭。在积极故意结束生命方面,欧洲各国的法律立场是一致的;这是被禁止的。然而,考虑到那些死亡过程可能漫长且痛苦的棘手情况,荷兰儿科医生报告称,在获得父母同意的情况下,他们有时确实会协助婴儿死亡。有两起案件已通过法庭审理,近期的官方建议也已制定出可据此评估此类行为的标准。