Suppr超能文献

极低胎龄新生儿的生命维持治疗的停止或撤离。

Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in extremely low gestational age neonates.

机构信息

Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Pediatrics, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 May;106(3):238-243. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-318855. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment (WWLST) for extremely low gestational age neonates.

DESIGN

Observational study of prospectively collected registry data from 19 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network centres on neonates born at 22-28 weeks gestation who died >12 hours through 120 days of age during 2011-2016. Sociodemographic and clinical factors were compared between infants who died following WWLST and without WWLST.

RESULTS

Of 1168 deaths, 67.1% occurred following WWLST. Withdrawal of assisted ventilation (97.4%) was the primary modality. WWLST rates were inversely proportional to gestational age. Life-sustaining treatment was withheld or withdrawn more often for non-Hispanic white infants than for non-Hispanic black infants (72.7% vs 60.4%; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.92) or Hispanic infants (72.7% vs 67.2%; 95% CI 1.32 to 3.72). WWLST rates varied across centres (38.6-92.6%; p<0.001). The centre with the highest rate had adjusted odds 4.89 times greater than the average (95% CI 1.18 to 20.18). The adjusted odds of WWLST were higher for infants with necrotiing enterocolitis (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.59) and severe brain injury (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.74).

CONCLUSIONS

Among infants who died, WWLST rates varied widely across centres and were associated with gestational age, race, ethnicity, necrotiing enterocolitis, and severe brain injury. Further exploration is needed into how race, centre, and approaches to care of infants with necrotiing enterocolitis and severe brain injury influence WWLST.

摘要

目的

确定与极低胎龄新生儿(22-28 周)的生命支持治疗(WWLST)的保留或停止相关的社会人口学和临床因素。

设计

对 2011-2016 年期间在全国儿童健康与人类发育研究所新生儿研究网络的 19 个中心出生、胎龄为 22-28 周且在 120 天内死亡时间超过 12 小时的新生儿进行前瞻性登记数据的观察性研究。比较 WWLST 后和无 WWLST 后死亡的婴儿之间的社会人口学和临床因素。

结果

在 1168 例死亡中,有 67.1%发生在 WWLST 后。停用辅助通气(97.4%)是主要方式。WWLST 率与胎龄成反比。与非西班牙裔黑人婴儿(72.7%比 60.4%;95%CI 1.00 至 1.92)或西班牙裔婴儿(72.7%比 67.2%;95%CI 1.32 至 3.72)相比,非西班牙裔白人婴儿更常进行生命支持治疗的保留或停止。WWLST 率在各中心之间存在差异(38.6-92.6%;p<0.001)。使用率最高的中心的调整后优势比(OR)是平均值的 4.89 倍(95%CI 1.18 至 20.18)。患有坏死性小肠结肠炎(OR 1.77,95%CI 1.21 至 2.59)和严重脑损伤(OR 1.98,95%CI 1.44 至 2.74)的婴儿 WWLST 的调整后 OR 更高。

结论

在死亡的婴儿中,WWLST 率在各中心之间差异很大,与胎龄、种族、民族、坏死性小肠结肠炎和严重脑损伤有关。需要进一步探讨种族、中心以及治疗坏死性小肠结肠炎和严重脑损伤婴儿的方法如何影响 WWLST。

相似文献

1
Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in extremely low gestational age neonates.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 May;106(3):238-243. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-318855. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
2
Outcomes of Preterm Infants following Discussions about Withdrawal or Withholding of Life Support.
J Pediatr. 2017 Nov;190:118-123.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.05.056. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
3
Circumstances, causes and timing of death in extremely preterm infants admitted to NICU: The EPIPAGE-2 study.
Acta Paediatr. 2023 Oct;112(10):2066-2074. doi: 10.1111/apa.16894. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
4
Survival and Long-Term Outcomes of Children Who Survived after End-of-Life Decisions in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.
J Pediatr. 2023 Aug;259:113422. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113422. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
5
Trends in Care Practices, Morbidity, and Mortality of Extremely Preterm Neonates, 1993-2012.
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1039-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10244.
7
Racial/Ethnic Disparities Among Extremely Preterm Infants in the United States From 2002 to 2016.
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e206757. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6757.
9
Social Determinants of Health and Redirection of Care for Infants Born Extremely Preterm.
JAMA Pediatr. 2024 May 1;178(5):454-464. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.0125.

引用本文的文献

2
End of life care in the setting of extreme prematurity - practical challenges and ethical controversies.
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2023 Aug;28(4):101442. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2023.101442. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
4
The center-effect on outcomes for infants born at less than 25 weeks.
Semin Perinatol. 2022 Feb;46(1):151538. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151538. Epub 2021 Nov 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Outcomes of Preterm Infants following Discussions about Withdrawal or Withholding of Life Support.
J Pediatr. 2017 Nov;190:118-123.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.05.056. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
2
Limiting and Withdrawing Life Support in the PICU: For Whom Are These Options Discussed?
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb;17(2):110-20. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000614.
3
End of life decisions for newborns: an ethical and compassionate process?
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Mar;101(2):F92-3. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309380. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
4
Trends in Care Practices, Morbidity, and Mortality of Extremely Preterm Neonates, 1993-2012.
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1039-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10244.
5
Neonatal deaths: prospective exploration of the causes and process of end-of-life decisions.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016 Mar;101(2):F102-7. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308425. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
6
Imposing genetic diversity.
Am J Bioeth. 2015;15(6):2-10. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1028658.
7
Between-hospital variation in treatment and outcomes in extremely preterm infants.
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 7;372(19):1801-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1410689.
10
Ethics in neonatology: a look over Europe.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Jul;25(7):984-91. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.602442. Epub 2011 Aug 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验