Turton A, Lemon R N
Department of Occupational Therapy, Addenbrooke's Hospital NHS Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Dec;129(4):559-72. doi: 10.1007/s002210050926.
Although it is well known that the corticospinal system exerts more influence over distal (hand and fingers) than proximal (elbow and shoulder) upper limb muscles, differences in the importance of this system for voluntary activation of these muscle groups have not been demonstrated directly. Two investigations were carried out to provide a quantitative comparison of the contribution of fast corticospinal inputs to voluntary activity in proximal and distal muscles of normal subjects. The first study confirmed that the rate of increase in the amplitude of EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with voluntary activation of the muscles was significantly greater in a hand muscle (first dorsal interosseous, 1DI) than in biceps, which was in turn greater than that for deltoid. The second study demonstrated that this result reflected a genuine difference in corticospinal influence over these muscles and was not due to differences in the pattern and type of motor unit recruitment in proximal vs distal muscles. The voluntary activation of a pair of low-threshold single motor units (SMUs) in 1DI and deltoid was compared with their response to TMS. In both muscles only a small amount of additional effort was required to recruit the second SMU; increments were typically within 1% of maximum voluntary contraction, as assessed from EMG measurements. Subjects were asked to voluntarily discharge the lower threshold SMU at a steady rate, and then the threshold of responses of this SMU and that of the second unit to TMS were determined. In 1DI, only small increments in TMS intensity above the threshold for the first SMU were required to activate the second unit [mean 1.4% maximum stimulator output (MSO), SD +/- 1.0%, n = 7 subjects]. In contrast, in deltoid a significantly greater intensity increase was needed (mean 6%, SD +/- 1.2%, MSO n = 7, P < 0.001). Similar results were obtained when TMS thresholds of motor unit pairs were assessed in relaxed subjects. These experiments support the hypothesis that the fast corticospinal input that can be activated by TMS is of greater importance for the voluntary activation of hand than of shoulder muscles. This hypothesis served as a basis for testing deltoid responses in three stroke patients. In two patients smaller responses to TMS were obtained on the affected side than on the unaffected side during the production of equivalent voluntary contractions, suggesting that the patients achieved these contractions using inputs other than the fast corticospinal elements excited by TMS.
虽然众所周知皮质脊髓系统对上肢远端(手和手指)肌肉的影响比对近端(肘部和肩部)肌肉的影响更大,但该系统对这些肌肉群自主激活的重要性差异尚未得到直接证实。进行了两项研究,以定量比较正常受试者近端和远端肌肉中快速皮质脊髓输入对自主活动的贡献。第一项研究证实,随着肌肉的自主激活,手部肌肉(第一背侧骨间肌,1DI)对经颅磁刺激(TMS)的肌电图反应幅度的增加率显著大于肱二头肌,肱二头肌又大于三角肌。第二项研究表明,这一结果反映了皮质脊髓对这些肌肉的影响存在真正差异,而不是由于近端与远端肌肉运动单位募集模式和类型的差异。比较了1DI和三角肌中一对低阈值单运动单位(SMU)的自主激活与其对TMS的反应。在两块肌肉中,募集第二个SMU仅需少量额外努力;增量通常在最大自主收缩的1%以内,这是根据肌电图测量评估的。要求受试者以稳定的速率自主释放阈值较低的SMU,然后确定该SMU和第二个单位对TMS反应的阈值。在1DI中,仅需在第一个SMU阈值之上少量增加TMS强度即可激活第二个单位[平均1.4%最大刺激器输出(MSO),标准差±1.0%,n = 7名受试者]。相比之下,在三角肌中则需要显著更大的强度增加(平均6%,标准差±1.2%,MSO,n = 7,P < 0.001)。当在放松的受试者中评估运动单位对的TMS阈值时,也得到了类似的结果。这些实验支持了这样一种假设,即TMS可激活的快速皮质脊髓输入对手部自主激活比对肩部肌肉更为重要。这一假设作为测试三名中风患者三角肌反应的基础。在两名患者中,在产生等效自主收缩时,患侧对TMS的反应比对侧小,这表明患者是通过TMS激发的快速皮质脊髓元件以外的输入来实现这些收缩的。