Kaunitz A M, Garceau R J, Cromie M A
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida Health Science Center, Jacksonville, USA.
Contraception. 1999 Oct;60(4):179-87. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00083-9.
An open-label, nonrandomized, parallel, controlled study compared the efficacy, safety, and cycle control of a new monthly injectable contraceptive containing 25 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and 5 mg of estradiol cypionate (E2C) (MPA/E2C) (Lunelle Monthly Contraceptive Injection) with that of a norethindrone 0.5, 0.75, 1.0 mg/0.035 mg ethinyl estradiol (NET/EE) triphasic oral contraceptive (Ortho-Novum 7/7/7). At study enrollment, women chose either the injections or the oral contraceptive. A higher proportion of women in the NET/EE group (65.1%) than in the MPA/E2C group (48.7%) had used hormonal contraception during the month before the study (p < 0.01). Overall, 55.5% (434/782) of MPA/E2C users and 67.6% (217/321) of NET/EE users completed the 60-week trial. One-year contraceptive efficacy (13 cycles of 28 days) for MPA/E2C and NET/EE was based on 8008 and 3434 woman-cycles of use, respectively. During the first year, one pregnancy occurred in an NET/EE user for a life table rate of 0.3; no pregnancies occurred in users of MPA/E2C. One additional pregnancy in the NET/EE group occurred during the 15th treatment cycle. After the first treatment cycle, women in both groups experienced regular menses, with an average cycle length of 28 days in MPA/E2C users and 27 days in NET/EE users. Although MPA/E2C users were more likely to experience bleeding irregularities, only 2.5% (19/775) cited metrorrhagia as a reason for discontinuing treatment. The adverse events reported in both treatment groups are consistent with those expected with the use of combined hormonal contraceptives. Overall, the results of this first Phase III US clinical trial of MPA/E2C confirm this method's high contraceptive efficacy and safety, as shown in previous studies by the World Health Organization. These results suggest that a monthly combination injectable would represent a welcome new contraceptive option for women in the US.
一项开放标签、非随机、平行对照研究,比较了一种新的每月注射一次的避孕药(含25毫克醋酸甲羟孕酮[MPA]和5毫克环丙孕酮[E2C])(MPA/E2C)(Lunelle每月注射用避孕药)与炔诺酮0.5、0.75、1.0毫克/0.035毫克炔雌醇(NET/EE)三相口服避孕药(Ortho-Novum 7/7/7)的疗效、安全性和周期控制情况。在研究入组时,女性可选择注射剂或口服避孕药。NET/EE组中在研究前一个月使用激素避孕的女性比例(65.1%)高于MPA/E2C组(48.7%)(p<0.01)。总体而言,MPA/E2C使用者中有55.5%(434/782)、NET/EE使用者中有67.6%(217/321)完成了60周试验。MPA/E2C和NET/EE的一年避孕效果(13个28天周期)分别基于8008和3434个女性使用周期。在第一年,一名NET/EE使用者怀孕,生命表率为0.3;MPA/E2C使用者中无怀孕情况。NET/EE组在第15个治疗周期又有一名使用者怀孕。在第一个治疗周期后,两组女性月经均规律,MPA/E2C使用者平均周期长度为28天,NET/EE使用者为27天。虽然MPA/E2C使用者更易出现出血不规律,但只有2.5%(19/775)将月经过多作为停药原因。两个治疗组报告的不良事件与使用复方激素避孕药预期的一致。总体而言,MPA/E2C的这项美国首次III期临床试验结果证实了该方法具有高避孕效果和安全性,正如世界卫生组织此前研究所显示的那样。这些结果表明,每月注射复方制剂对美国女性来说将是一种受欢迎的新避孕选择。