• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病并感染流感嗜血杆菌的儿童和年轻人中,比较匹氨西林加匹美西林与匹氨西林的随机试验。

Randomised trial of pivampicillin plus pivmecillinam vs. pivampicillin in children and young adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and infection with Haemophilus influenzae.

作者信息

Johansen H K, Børch K, Espersen F, Koch C, Høiby N

机构信息

Department of Clinical Microbiology, H:S Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 1999;15(4):300-9. doi: 10.1185/03007999909116501.

DOI:10.1185/03007999909116501
PMID:10640263
Abstract

A prospective, randomised, single-blind comparative trial was carried out to determine whether double beta-lactam treatment with pivampicillin plus pivmecillinam is more effective than pivampicillin alone in the treatment of recurrent and chronic lung infections with Haemophilus influenzae in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or cystic fibrosis (CF). Fifty-six children and young adults with COPD or CF were randomised to the clinical study. The patients were allocated at random to receive perorally either pivmecillinam, 40 mg/kg/day, combined with pivampicillin, 50 mg/kg/day, or pivampicillin 50 mg/kg/day alone for 14 days. A cross-over pharmacokinetic study using the same drugs was carried out in 10 CF patients to determine the antibiotic concentrations in serum and sputum after a single dose of each drug. The clinical study showed no significant differences in clinical scoring, lung function tests or adverse events after treatment with pivampicillin plus pivmecillinam or pivampicillin alone. Follow-up microbiological evaluation 2 and 6 weeks after the end of treatment showed that the offending pathogen was eradicated in 68% of the patients treated with pivampicillin plus pivmecillinam and in 67% of the patients treated with pivampicillin alone. Reinfection with another biotype was more common in the combination group (50% vs. 21%) than in the pivampicillin group. In the pharmacokinetic study the median peak serum concentration occurred two hours after intake of tablets. The efficacy of double beta lactam treatment in lung infections with H. influenzae appears to be equivalent to that of ampicillin on clinical lung symptoms, lung function tests, adverse effects and bacteriology.

摘要

开展了一项前瞻性、随机、单盲对照试验,以确定在治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或囊性纤维化(CF)患者的复发性和慢性流感嗜血杆菌肺部感染时,匹氨西林加匹美西林双β-内酰胺治疗是否比单用匹氨西林更有效。56名患有COPD或CF的儿童和青年被随机纳入临床研究。患者被随机分配口服以下药物,为期14天:匹美西林40mg/kg/天加匹氨西林50mg/kg/天,或单用匹氨西林50mg/kg/天。在10名CF患者中进行了一项使用相同药物的交叉药代动力学研究,以确定每种药物单剂量给药后血清和痰液中的抗生素浓度。临床研究表明,匹氨西林加匹美西林或单用匹氨西林治疗后,临床评分、肺功能测试或不良事件方面无显著差异。治疗结束后2周和6周的随访微生物学评估显示,在接受匹氨西林加匹美西林治疗的患者中,68%的患者致病病原体被根除,而在接受单用匹氨西林治疗的患者中这一比例为67%。联合治疗组再次感染另一种生物型的情况比匹氨西林组更常见(50%对21%)。在药代动力学研究中,血清峰值浓度中位数在服用片剂后两小时出现。在临床肺部症状、肺功能测试、不良反应和细菌学方面,双β-内酰胺治疗流感嗜血杆菌肺部感染的疗效似乎与氨苄西林相当。

相似文献

1
Randomised trial of pivampicillin plus pivmecillinam vs. pivampicillin in children and young adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and infection with Haemophilus influenzae.在患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病并感染流感嗜血杆菌的儿童和年轻人中,比较匹氨西林加匹美西林与匹氨西林的随机试验。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1999;15(4):300-9. doi: 10.1185/03007999909116501.
2
A comparative study of amoxycillin and pivampicillin in persistent Haemophilus influenzae infection of the lower respiratory tract in children with chronic lung disease.阿莫西林与匹氨西林治疗慢性肺病患儿下呼吸道持续性流感嗜血杆菌感染的比较研究
Scand J Infect Dis. 1986;18(3):245-54. doi: 10.3109/00365548609032334.
3
Double-blind comparison of pivmecillinam plus pivampicillin ('Miraxid') with pivampicillin alone in chronic bronchitis: a Danish multi-centre study.匹美西林加匹氨西林(“Miraxid”)与单用匹氨西林治疗慢性支气管炎的双盲比较:一项丹麦多中心研究。
Pharmatherapeutica. 1983;3(6):422-8.
4
A multi-centre general practice comparison of a fixed-dose combination of pivmecillinam plus pivampicillin with amoxycillin in respiratory tract infections.多中心全科医疗中,匹美西林与匹氨西林固定剂量复方制剂和阿莫西林治疗呼吸道感染的比较。
Pharmatherapeutica. 1985;4(5):300-5.
5
A comparison of pivmecillinam/pivampicillin and amoxycillin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.匹美西林/匹氨西林与阿莫西林在慢性支气管炎急性加重期的比较。
J Int Med Res. 1987 Mar-Apr;15(2):115-20. doi: 10.1177/030006058701500209.
6
Pivmecillinam in the treatment of therapy resistant urinary tract infections. A comparison with pivmecillinam, pivampicillin and their combination.
Infection. 1980;8(1):27-31. doi: 10.1007/BF01677395.
7
Efficacy of the combination pivampicillin/pivmecillinam compared to placebo in the treatment of convalescent carriers of nontyphi Salmonella.与安慰剂相比,匹氨西林/匹美西林联合用药治疗非伤寒沙门菌恢复期带菌者的疗效。
Infection. 1990 May-Jun;18(3):163-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01642105.
8
A comparison of pivmecillinam/pivampicillin and co-trimoxazole in hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.住院慢性支气管炎急性加重患者中匹美西林/匹氨西林与复方新诺明的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1984 Aug;14(2):179-84. doi: 10.1093/jac/14.2.179.
9
Pivmecillinam plus pivampicillin versus co-trimoxazole in patients undergoing transurethral prostate resection.经尿道前列腺切除术患者中匹美西林加匹氨西林与复方新诺明的对比研究
Pharmatherapeutica. 1984;3(10):686-91.
10
A multi-centre general practice clinical evaluation of pivmecillinam plus pivampicillin ('Miraxid') and co-trimoxazole ('Septrin') in respiratory tract infections.多中心全科医疗对匹美西林加匹氨西林(“Miraxid”)与复方新诺明(“Septrin”)治疗呼吸道感染的临床评估。
Curr Med Res Opin. 1985;9(10):659-65. doi: 10.1185/03007998509109648.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and Tolerability of Pivmecillinam During More Than Four Decades of Clinical Experience: A Systematic Review.四十年临床经验中匹美西林的安全性和耐受性:一项系统评价
Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 24;80(2):280-299. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae621.
2
Oral anti-pseudomonal antibiotics for cystic fibrosis.用于囊性纤维化的口服抗假单胞菌抗生素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 14;7(7):CD005405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005405.pub4.