Suppr超能文献

聚多卡醇与阿昔莫司治疗II型高胆固醇血症患者的对比研究。

A comparative study of policosanol Versus acipimox in patients with type II hypercholesterolemia.

作者信息

Alcocer L, Fernández L, Campos E, Más R

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City.

出版信息

Int J Tissue React. 1999;21(3):85-92.

Abstract

An 8-week, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of policosanol and acipimox was conducted in patients with type II hypercholesterolemia. Prior to entry into active treatment, all patients followed a standard cholesterol-lowering diet for 12 weeks. Sixty-three patients were randomized to receive either policosanol (10 mg/day) or acipimox (750 mg/day) tablets for 8 weeks under double-blind conditions. Both groups were similar at randomization. Policosanol significantly reduced total cholesterol (p < 0.0001) (15.8%), low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (21%) and the ratios of LDL-cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (15.8%) and cholesterol to HDL-cholesterol (11.5%). Acipimox significantly lowered both cholesterol and LDL cholesterol by 7.5%. The percent changes of total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and both ratios were larger in the policosanol group than in the acipimox group. Both drugs were well tolerated. Acipimox significantly increased (p > 0.001) aspartate amino transferase levels but only four patients showed increases above the normal limit. Policosanol significantly reduced creatinine values (p > 0.05) but no patients had values out of the normal range. Four patients withdrew from the study (two from each group) but none withdrew because of adverse effects. No adverse effects were reported in the policosanol group, while five patients on acipimox reported adverse effects (hot flushes, nausea, vomiting, headache, hypochondrial pain and leg edema). These results indicate that policosanol (10 mg/day) was more effective and well tolerated than was acipimox (750 mg/day) in this study population.

摘要

一项为期8周的随机双盲研究,比较了聚多卡醇和阿西莫司在II型高胆固醇血症患者中的疗效和耐受性。在开始积极治疗之前,所有患者遵循标准的降胆固醇饮食12周。63名患者被随机分为两组,在双盲条件下分别接受聚多卡醇(10毫克/天)或阿西莫司(750毫克/天)片剂治疗8周。两组在随机分组时情况相似。聚多卡醇显著降低了总胆固醇(p<0.0001)(降低了15.8%)、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)胆固醇(降低了21%)以及LDL胆固醇与高密度脂蛋白(HDL)胆固醇的比值(降低了15.8%)和胆固醇与HDL胆固醇的比值(降低了11.5%)。阿西莫司使胆固醇和LDL胆固醇均显著降低了7.5%。聚多卡醇组总胆固醇、LDL胆固醇及两个比值的变化百分比均大于阿西莫司组。两种药物耐受性均良好。阿西莫司显著升高了天冬氨酸氨基转移酶水平(p>0.001),但只有4名患者的升高值超过正常上限。聚多卡醇显著降低了肌酐值(p>0.05),但没有患者的值超出正常范围。4名患者退出了研究(每组2名),但均非因不良反应退出。聚多卡醇组未报告不良反应,而5名服用阿西莫司的患者报告了不良反应(潮热、恶心、呕吐、头痛、季肋部疼痛和腿部水肿)。这些结果表明,在该研究人群中,聚多卡醇(10毫克/天)比阿西莫司(750毫克/天)更有效且耐受性更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验