Cestari I N, Min K T, Kulli J C, Yang J
Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
J Neurochem. 2000 Feb;74(2):827-38. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2000.740827.x.
Murine gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A homomeric receptors made of beta1 subunits are profoundly different, when expressed in Xenopus oocytes, from beta3 homomeric receptors. Application of the intravenous general anesthetic pentobarbital, etomidate, or propofol to beta3 homomeric receptors allows current flow. In contrast, beta1 homomers do not respond to any of these agents. Through construction of chimeric beta1/beta3 receptors, we identified a single amino acid that determines the pharmacological difference between the two beta subunits. When the serine residue present in the wild-type nonresponsive beta1 subunit is replaced by an asparagine found in the same position in the beta3 subunit, the resulting point-mutated beta1S265N forms receptors responsive to intravenous general anesthetics, like the wild-type beta3 subunits. Conversely, after mutation of the wild-type beta3 to beta3N265S, the homomeric receptor loses its ability to respond to these same general anesthetics. Wild-type-to-mutant titration experiments showed that the nonresponsive phenotype is dominant: A single nonresponsive residue within a pentameric receptor is sufficient to render the receptor nonresponsive. In alpha1betax or alpha1betaxgamma2 heteromeric receptors, the same residue manifests as a partial determinant of the degree of potentiation of the GABA-induced current by some general anesthetics. The location of this amino acid at the extracellular end of the second transmembrane segment, its influence in both homomeric and heteromeric receptor function, and its dominant behavior suggest that this residue of the beta subunit is involved in an allosteric modulation of the receptor.
由β1亚基构成的小鼠γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)A型同聚体受体,当在非洲爪蟾卵母细胞中表达时,与β3同聚体受体有很大不同。将静脉全身麻醉药戊巴比妥、依托咪酯或丙泊酚应用于β3同聚体受体时可使电流通过。相比之下,β1同聚体对这些药物均无反应。通过构建嵌合β1/β3受体,我们确定了一个单一氨基酸,它决定了这两种β亚基之间的药理学差异。当野生型无反应的β1亚基中存在的丝氨酸残基被β3亚基相同位置的天冬酰胺取代时,产生的点突变β1S265N形成了对静脉全身麻醉药有反应的受体,就像野生型β3亚基一样。相反,野生型β3突变为β3N265S后,同聚体受体失去了对这些相同全身麻醉药的反应能力。野生型到突变体的滴定实验表明无反应表型是显性的:五聚体受体中的单个无反应残基足以使受体无反应。在α1βx或α1βxγ2异聚体受体中,相同的残基表现为某些全身麻醉药对GABA诱导电流增强程度的部分决定因素。该氨基酸位于第二个跨膜片段的细胞外末端,它对同聚体和异聚体受体功能均有影响,且具有显性行为,这表明β亚基的这个残基参与了受体的变构调节。