• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

旋转式牙刷与声波震动牙刷对改善成年牙周炎患者牙龈健康状况的疗效比较

Comparative efficacy of a rotary and a sonic powered toothbrush on improving gingival health in treated adult periodontitis patients.

作者信息

Bader H I, Boyd R L

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of the Pacific, San Francisco, CA 94115, USA.

出版信息

Am J Dent. 1999 Jun;12(3):143-7.

PMID:10649937
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of two powered brushing instruments (Rota-dent, rotary action instrument and Sonicare, a sonic instrument) for reductions of plaque and gingivitis in a treated adult periodontal patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients, randomly selected from a pool of patients in periodontal maintenance after surgical periodontal treatment, completed this study. A split mouth, blind, crossover design was utilized in this 12-week trial with each patient acting as his/her own control. After subjects alternately brushed one-half of their mouths with each of the instruments; a crossover in the brushing pattern occurred at 6 weeks, with no wash out period. Single-blind clinical assessments were made by a calibrated investigator at six sites per tooth for contralateral incisors, premolars and molars at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks. Gingival Index (GI), Plaque Index (PI) and Papillary Bleeding Index (PBI) were determined. A prophylaxis was done for all subjects after baseline recordings.

RESULTS

Mean percent reductions from baseline for GI, PI and PBI at the end of 6 and 12 weeks were 75.0%, 68.9%, 73.4% and 76.4%, 69.9%, 74.0%, respectively for the rotary instrument, and 57.7%, 53.3%, 54.3% and 57.7%, 53.6%, 54.7%, respectively for the sonic brush. One-way ANOVA indicated that the rotary instrument was significantly more effective (P < 0.005) than the sonic brush in removing plaque and reducing gingivitis in treated adult periodontitis patients.

摘要

目的

比较两种电动刷牙器械(旋转式洁牙器Rota-dent和声波震动牙刷Sonicare)对已接受治疗的成年牙周病患者减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎的效果。

材料与方法

从接受牙周手术后处于牙周维护期的患者群体中随机选取40名患者完成本研究。在这项为期12周的试验中采用了双侧对照、盲法、交叉设计,每位患者作为自己的对照。受试者用每种器械交替刷半口牙;6周时刷牙方式交叉,无洗脱期。由一名经过校准的研究人员在基线、6周和12周时对每颗牙齿的对侧切牙、前磨牙和磨牙的六个部位进行单盲临床评估。测定牙龈指数(GI)、菌斑指数(PI)和龈乳头出血指数(PBI)。在基线记录后对所有受试者进行了一次预防性洁治。

结果

6周和12周结束时,旋转式器械的GI、PI和PBI相对于基线的平均降低百分比分别为75.0%、68.9%、73.4%和76.4%、69.9%、74.0%,声波震动牙刷的相应数据分别为57.7%、53.3%、54.3%和57.7%、53.6%、54.7%。单因素方差分析表明,在已接受治疗的成年牙周炎患者中,旋转式器械在去除牙菌斑和减少牙龈炎方面比声波震动牙刷显著更有效(P < 0.005)。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy of a rotary and a sonic powered toothbrush on improving gingival health in treated adult periodontitis patients.旋转式牙刷与声波震动牙刷对改善成年牙周炎患者牙龈健康状况的疗效比较
Am J Dent. 1999 Jun;12(3):143-7.
2
Clinical and laboratory evaluation of powered electric toothbrushes: comparative efficacy of two powered brushing instruments in furcations and interproximal areas.电动牙刷的临床与实验室评估:两种电动刷牙器械在分叉区和邻面区域的比较疗效
J Clin Dent. 1997;8(3 Spec No):91-4.
3
Clinical comparison of plaque removal and gingival bleeding reduction by two different brush heads on a sonic toothbrush.两种不同刷头的声波牙刷在去除牙菌斑和减少牙龈出血方面的临床比较。
J Clin Dent. 2000;11(2):29-34.
4
A split-mouth comparison of a three-dimensional-action electric toothbrush and a high-frequency electric toothbrush for reducing plaque and gingivitis.三维动作电动牙刷与高频电动牙刷减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎的分口对照研究。
J Int Acad Periodontol. 2001 Oct;3(4):95-103.
5
A 12-week clinical comparison of an oscillating-rotating power brush versus a marketed sonic brush with self-adjusting technology in reducing plaque and gingivitis.一项为期12周的临床比较:振荡旋转电动牙刷与一款具有自动调节技术的市售声波牙刷在减少牙菌斑和牙龈炎方面的效果。
J Clin Dent. 2013;24(2):55-61.
6
A six-week clinical evaluation of the plaque and gingivitis efficacy of an oscillating-rotating power toothbrush with a novel brush head utilizing angled CrissCross bristles versus a sonic toothbrush.一项为期六周的临床评估,比较一款采用新型刷头、带有成角度交叉刷毛的旋转振荡电动牙刷与一款声波牙刷在清除牙菌斑和治疗牙龈炎方面的功效。
J Clin Dent. 2014;25(2):6-12.
7
A randomized 12-week study to compare the gingivitis and plaque reduction benefits of a rotation-oscillation power toothbrush and a sonic power toothbrush.一项为期12周的随机研究,比较旋转振荡式电动牙刷和声波电动牙刷在减少牙龈炎和牙菌斑方面的益处。
J Clin Dent. 2009;20(3):93-8.
8
Comparison of irrigation to floss as an adjunct to tooth brushing: effect on bleeding, gingivitis, and supragingival plaque.将冲洗与牙线作为刷牙辅助手段的比较:对出血、牙龈炎和龈上菌斑的影响。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(3):71-7.
9
A randomized, parallel design study to evaluate the effects of a Sonicare and a manual toothbrush on plaque and gingivitis.一项评估声波震动牙刷和手动牙刷对牙菌斑及牙龈炎影响的随机平行设计研究。
J Clin Dent. 2008;19(2):64-8.
10
Comparison of rotation/oscillation and sonic power toothbrushes on plaque and gingivitis for 10 weeks.旋转/振荡式牙刷与声波电动牙刷对牙菌斑和牙龈炎影响的10周比较。
Am J Dent. 2009 Dec;22(6):345-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Efficacy of Powered Oscillating Heads vs. Powered Sonic Action Heads Toothbrushes to Maintain Periodontal and Peri-Implant Health: A Narrative Review.动力振荡刷头与动力超声振动刷头牙刷维持牙周及种植体周围健康的疗效:叙述性评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 4;18(4):1468. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041468.
2
Different powered toothbrushes for plaque control and gingival health.用于控制牙菌斑和维护牙龈健康的不同动力牙刷。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 8;2010(12):CD004971. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004971.pub2.