Diniz-Filho J A, Fuchs S, Arias M C
Departamento de Biologia Geral, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, C.P. 131, 74.001-970, Goiânia, GO, Brasil.
Heredity (Edinb). 1999 Dec;83 ( Pt 6):671-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00608.x.
The analysis of phenotypic divergence among local populations within a species has been traditionally performed in a spatial context, although advances in genetic analysis using mtDNA have permitted a simultaneous evaluation of geographical and historical patterns of variation, so-called phylogeographical analysis. In this paper, we combine these two dimensions of variation (geographical space and phylogenetic history) to evaluate patterns of phenotypic evolution in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Data on 39 phenotypic traits, derived from 417 colonies grouped into 14 subspecies, were analysed using autocorrelation methods. Mantel tests indicated that the relationship between phenotypic divergence, estimated by Euclidean distances among subspecies' morphological centroids, was significant both when compared to geographical distance (r=0.371; P < 0.01) and to genetic distance (estimated as sequence divergence (%) in a mtDNA region encompassing part of the NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 and isoleucine transfer RNA (r=0.329; P < 0.01)). For the analysis of each trait, the effects of the geographical co-ordinates (latitude and longitude of subspecies geographical range) and of the phylogenetic patterns (defined by eigenvectors of the genetic distance matrix) on phenotypic variation were simultaneously analysed using an extension of a recently developed model, called Phylogenetic Eigenvector Regression (PVR). In general terms, the partial regression slopes indicated that the variation in the characters traditionally associated with adaptive processes, such as body and wing size, were better explained by geographical position. However, characters usually thought to be neutral, such as wing venation angle, were more associated with phylogeny. This is expected because PVR can be interpreted as a partition model, in which adaptive variation tends to be independent of phylogeny (and, in this case, associated with geography). In addition, the first principal component derived from the expected values of the model for each trait, which can be interpreted as the phenotypic variation predicted by phylogeny, is more structured in a north-south cline than are the original data, supporting an adaptive interpretation. The phylogeographical autocorrelation analyses performed in this study show that different traits are more related to one of the two dimensions of variation (geography and phylogeny), and these patterns can furnish insights into the nature of phenotypic evolution in these organisms.
传统上,对一个物种内当地种群间表型差异的分析是在空间背景下进行的,尽管利用线粒体DNA(mtDNA)进行遗传分析的进展使得能够同时评估地理和历史变异模式,即所谓的系统地理学分析。在本文中,我们结合变异的这两个维度(地理空间和系统发育历史)来评估蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)的表型进化模式。我们使用自相关方法分析了来自417个蜂群、分为14个亚种的39个表型性状的数据。曼特尔检验表明,用亚种形态中心之间的欧几里得距离估计的表型差异与地理距离(r = 0.371;P < 0.01)和遗传距离(估计为包含部分NADH脱氢酶亚基2和异亮氨酸转移RNA的线粒体DNA区域中的序列差异(%),r = 0.329;P < 0.01)相比均具有显著相关性。对于每个性状的分析,我们使用一种称为系统发育特征向量回归(PVR)的最近开发模型的扩展,同时分析地理坐标(亚种地理范围的纬度和经度)和系统发育模式(由遗传距离矩阵的特征向量定义)对表型变异的影响。一般而言,偏回归斜率表明,传统上与适应性过程相关的特征(如身体和翅膀大小)的变异,通过地理位置能得到更好的解释。然而,通常被认为是中性的特征(如翅脉角度)与系统发育的关联更强。这是可以预料的,因为PVR可以解释为一种划分模型,其中适应性变异往往独立于系统发育(在这种情况下,与地理相关)。此外,从模型对每个性状的期望值导出的第一主成分,可解释为由系统发育预测的表型变异,在南北梯度上比原始数据更具结构性,支持了适应性解释。本研究中进行的系统地理学自相关分析表明,不同性状与变异的两个维度(地理和系统发育)之一的相关性更强,这些模式能够为这些生物体表型进化的本质提供见解。