• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种文化背景下大学生的学习方法:对比格斯3P模型的调查

University students' learning approaches in three cultures: an investigation of Biggs's 3P model.

作者信息

Zhang L F

机构信息

Department of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

J Psychol. 2000 Jan;134(1):37-55. doi: 10.1080/00223980009600847.

DOI:10.1080/00223980009600847
PMID:10654845
Abstract

The relationship of various learning approaches to students' academic achievement, abilities, and other characteristics was examined in a sample of university students in Hong Kong, mainland China, and the United States. The theoretical framework for this project was J. B. Biggs's (1987) theory of student learning approaches. The participants completed the Study Process Questionnaire (based on Biggs's theory) and provided a variety of demographic information. The participants' achievement scores and self-rated scores on analytical, creative, and practical abilities were also obtained. Results indicated that scores on certain subscales of the Study Process Questionnaire statistically predicted participants' achievement beyond their self-rated abilities. In addition, certain learning approaches were significantly related to the participants' ages, gender, parents' education levels, and their travel and work experiences. Implications of these findings are discussed as they relate to teaching and learning.

摘要

在香港、中国大陆和美国的大学生样本中,研究了各种学习方法与学生学业成绩、能力及其他特征之间的关系。该项目的理论框架是J. B. 比格斯(1987)的学生学习方法理论。参与者完成了学习过程问卷(基于比格斯的理论)并提供了各种人口统计学信息。还获取了参与者的成绩分数以及他们在分析、创造和实践能力方面的自评分数。结果表明,学习过程问卷某些分量表的分数在统计学上能够预测参与者的成绩,且超出了他们的自评能力。此外,某些学习方法与参与者的年龄、性别、父母教育水平以及他们的旅行和工作经历显著相关。本文讨论了这些研究结果对教学的启示。

相似文献

1
University students' learning approaches in three cultures: an investigation of Biggs's 3P model.三种文化背景下大学生的学习方法:对比格斯3P模型的调查
J Psychol. 2000 Jan;134(1):37-55. doi: 10.1080/00223980009600847.
2
Do thinking styles contribute to academic achievement beyond self-rated abilities?思维方式对学业成绩的贡献是否超出了自我评估的能力?
J Psychol. 2001 Nov;135(6):621-37. doi: 10.1080/00223980109603724.
3
Are learning approaches and thinking styles related? A study in two Chinese populations.学习方法与思维方式有关联吗?对两组中国人群的一项研究。
J Psychol. 2000 Sep;134(5):469-89. doi: 10.1080/00223980009598230.
4
Revisiting the concept of 'style match'.重新审视“风格匹配”的概念。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2013 Jun;83(Pt 2):225-37. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12011. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
5
Teachers as scholars of their students' conceptions of learning: a Hong Kong investigation.教师作为学生学习观念的研究者:一项香港调查。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2004 Sep;74(Pt 3):361-73. doi: 10.1348/0007099041552332.
6
Approaches to learning and academic achievement of Filipino students.菲律宾学生的学习方法与学业成绩。
J Genet Psychol. 2003 Mar;164(1):101-14. doi: 10.1080/00221320309597506.
7
Assessment of learning and study strategies of university students in Qatar using an Arabic translation of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory.使用《学习与学习策略量表》阿拉伯语译本对卡塔尔大学生的学习与学习策略进行评估。
Psychol Rep. 2014 Jun;114(3):947-65. doi: 10.2466/11.03.PR0.114k26w3. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
8
Conceptions of learning, approaches to studying and personal development in UK higher education.英国高等教育中的学习观念、学习方法与个人发展
Br J Educ Psychol. 2009 Jun;79(Pt 2):295-309. doi: 10.1348/000709908X368866. Epub 2008 Nov 17.
9
University students' achievement goals and approaches to learning in mathematics.大学生在数学学习方面的成就目标和学习方法。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2009 Mar;79(Pt 1):131-53. doi: 10.1348/000709908X314928. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
10
Grade differences in reading motivation among Hong Kong primary and secondary students.香港中小学生阅读动机的年级差异。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2009 Dec;79(Pt 4):713-33. doi: 10.1348/000709909X460042. Epub 2009 Jun 30.

引用本文的文献

1
, CMMSPW in a university environment: theoretical basis, structure and functionality.大学环境中的CMMSPW:理论基础、结构与功能。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 31;14:1299224. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1299224. eCollection 2023.
2
The relationship between Chinese university students' learning preparation and learning achievement within the EFL blended teaching context in COVID-19 post-epidemic era: The mediating effect of learning methods.新冠疫情后混合式教学环境下中国大学生学习准备度与学习成绩的关系:学习方法的中介作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 24;18(1):e0280919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280919. eCollection 2023.
3
A Path Analysis Model of Self- vs. Educational-Context- Regulation as Combined Predictors of Well-Being in Spanish College Students.
自我与教育情境调节的路径分析模型对西班牙大学生幸福感的综合预测
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 17;19(16):10223. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610223.
4
Measuring students' approaches to learning in different clinical rotations.测量学生在不同临床实习中的学习方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Nov 15;12:114. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-114.