Zhang L F
Department of Education, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
J Psychol. 2001 Nov;135(6):621-37. doi: 10.1080/00223980109603724.
This research identifies individual differences in academic achievement attributable to thinking styles over and above what can be explained by self-rated abilities. Participants were 209 university students from Hong Kong and 215 university students from mainland China. Participants responded to the Thinking Styles Inventory (Chinese version) that is based on Sternberg's theory of mental self-government (R. J. Sternberg, 1988). They also rated their own analytical, creative, and practical abilities on a 10-point scale based on R. J. Sternberg's (1985) triarchic theory of human intelligence. Participants' academic achievement scores were also used. The prediction that thinking styles statistically predict academic achievement was supported by data from both Hong Kong and mainland China. Academic achievement and thinking styles are related differently in the two groups. Implications of these findings for both teaching and research are discussed.
本研究确定了学业成绩方面的个体差异,这些差异可归因于思维方式,超出了自我评定能力所能解释的范围。参与者包括209名来自香港的大学生和215名来自中国大陆的大学生。参与者对基于斯滕伯格心理自我管理理论(R. J. 斯滕伯格,1988年)的《思维方式量表》(中文版)做出了回应。他们还根据R. J. 斯滕伯格(1985年)的人类智力三元理论,在10分制量表上对自己的分析、创造和实践能力进行了评分。参与者的学业成绩分数也被采用。来自香港和中国大陆的数据均支持思维方式在统计学上能够预测学业成绩这一预测。两组中,学业成绩与思维方式的关联有所不同。本文讨论了这些研究结果对教学和研究的启示。