Influence of response modality on awareness of contralesional tactile stimuli in right brain damaged patients.

Thirty right brain-damaged (RBD) patients with left tactile extinction (19 of whom also showed neglect) were given a sequence of 240 tactile stimuli--80 right, 80 left, 80 bilateral--across 4 different response conditions: (a) verbal report of stimulated side/s, (b) motor report of stimulated side/s, (c) verbal report of unstimulated side/s, (d) motor report of unstimulated side/s. Earlier experiments based on similar tasks but involving RBD patients with visual extinction and/or neglect have shown that visual awareness of contralesional stimuli can be influenced by manipulation of response conditions. Since neglect and extinction can be double-dissociated both anatomically and behaviourally, the question arises of whether the underlying neuronal mechanisms are different. To answer this question the present work investigated the role of perceptual and premotor factors in generating tactile extinction in response to Double Simultaneous Stimulation (DSS). The hypothesis was that a directional response bias would result in an overall higher frequency of errors for verbal or motor responses indicating the ipsilesional side (right); a perceptual bias would instead result in errors distributed with similar frequency on the ipsilesional and the contralesional (left) side. Results showed that, in RBD patients, contralesional extinction was not influenced by response conditions (verbal/motor; report of stimulated/unstimulated side) and presence/absence of neglect. This suggests that: (1) among RBD patients, directional response biases are unlikely to play a role in extinction of tactile stimuli on DSS; (2) the mechanisms underlying extinction are, at least to some extent, different from those underlying unilateral neglect.