Ylagan L R, Scholes J, Demopoulos R
Department of Pathology, Division of Surgical Pathology, the Kaplan Cancer Center of the New York University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000 Feb;124(2):212-5. doi: 10.5858/2000-124-0212-C.
To test the hypothesis that CD44 standard (CD44[s]) and its other variants, CD44v6 and CD44v7-8, might be useful markers of squamous differentiation in epithelial tumors.
We studied expression of CD44(s), CD44v6, and CD44v7-8 using immunohistochemistry in human tumors that had squamous differentiation, glandular differentiation, or both arising in the colon, stomach, esophagus, lung, pancreas, gallbladder, or uterus/cervix, as well as in adjacent nonneoplastic tissues. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded archival tissue specimens of 33 adenosquamous tumors were used. All were stained with monoclonal antibodies against a conserved portion of CD44(s) and its variants, CD44v6 and CD44v7-8, using the avidin-biotin peroxidase method.
CD44(s) and its variants consistently and strongly stained areas of tumors with well-developed squamous differentiation. These markers also consistently and strongly stained normal squamous mucosa. Reactivity for CD44 and its variants was lacking in normal glandular type epithelium and in adenocarcinomas composed entirely of well-differentiated mucin-producing glands. Areas of well-differentiated carcinoma, both squamous and adenocarcinoma, were consistent with respect to both extent and intensity of staining. Staining in lymph nodes was similar to that in the primary tumors, with well-differentiated squamous foci being consistently positive, well-differentiated mucin-producing adenocarcinoma foci consistently negative, and poorly differentiated foci showing variable staining. Although staining was less intense with the variants, it followed the same staining pattern as found for CD44(s). No differences in the extent or intensity of staining were identified in the metastatic versus primary tumor foci, nor was any difference identified between superficial and deeply invasive areas of primary tumors.
Our study shows that CD44(s) and its variants are good markers of squamous epithelial differentiation in several types of normal epithelium and tumors, and that these markers can identify areas of well- to moderately differentiated elements in adenosquamous neoplasms. However, poorly differentiated tumors show an inconsistent staining pattern with CD44, such that it cannot be used as a reliable and practical marker of squamous differentiation in poorly differentiated neoplasms.
检验CD44标准型(CD44[s])及其其他变体CD44v6和CD44v7-8可能是上皮性肿瘤中鳞状分化有用标志物的假说。
我们采用免疫组织化学方法研究了CD44[s]、CD44v6和CD44v7-8在具有鳞状分化、腺性分化或两者皆有的人类肿瘤中的表达情况,这些肿瘤发生于结肠、胃、食管、肺、胰腺、胆囊或子宫/宫颈,同时也研究了其在相邻非肿瘤组织中的表达。使用了33例腺鳞癌的福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋存档组织标本。采用抗生物素蛋白-生物素过氧化物酶法,用针对CD44[s]及其变体CD44v6和CD44v7-8保守部分的单克隆抗体对所有标本进行染色。
CD44[s]及其变体始终强烈染色鳞状分化良好的肿瘤区域。这些标志物也始终强烈染色正常鳞状黏膜。正常腺性上皮和完全由高分化黏液分泌腺组成的腺癌对CD44及其变体无反应性。高分化癌区域,无论是鳞状癌还是腺癌,在染色范围和强度方面均一致。淋巴结中的染色与原发性肿瘤相似,高分化鳞状病灶始终呈阳性,高分化黏液分泌腺癌病灶始终呈阴性,低分化病灶染色情况不一。虽然变体的染色强度较弱,但其染色模式与CD44[s]相同。在转移灶与原发性肿瘤灶之间未发现染色范围或强度的差异,在原发性肿瘤的浅表和深部浸润区域之间也未发现任何差异。
我们的研究表明,CD44[s]及其变体是几种正常上皮和肿瘤中鳞状上皮分化的良好标志物,并且这些标志物可以识别腺鳞肿瘤中高分化至中分化成分的区域。然而,低分化肿瘤对CD44的染色模式不一致,因此它不能用作低分化肿瘤中鳞状分化的可靠实用标志物。