• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Time course of differences in lymphocyte proliferation rates after laparotomy vs CO(2) insufflation.

作者信息

Lee S W, Southall J C, Gleason N R, Huang E H, Bessler M, Whelan R L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2000 Feb;14(2):145-8. doi: 10.1007/s004649900087.

DOI:10.1007/s004649900087
PMID:10656948
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our laboratory has previously demonstrated that cell-mediated immune function is significantly more suppressed after both laparotomy and laparoscopic-assisted bowel resection than after peritoneal insufflation or open bowel resection, as assessed by delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) response. The purpose of this study was to further evaluate cell-mediated immunity by examining lymphocyte proliferation rates after laparotomy vs CO(2) insufflation.

METHODS

Female Balb/C mice (n = 75) were randomly divided into the following three groups: (a) anesthesia control (A/C), (b) CO(2) insufflation (INS), and (c) sham laparotomy (OPEN). The A/C group mice underwent no procedure. The INS group underwent insufflation with CO(2) gas at 4-6 mmHg for 20 min. The OPEN group underwent a midline incision from xiphoid to pubic symphysis, which was clipped closed after 20 min. Splenocytes were obtained via splenic harvest and lymphocyte isolation on postoperative days (POD) 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8. Lymphocyte proliferation was determined by a nonradioactive colorimetric MTS/PMS assay 72 h after concanavalin A stimulation.

RESULTS

The laparotomy group's lymphocyte proliferation rates were significantly lower than both the control and the insufflation groups on POD 2, POD 3, and POD 4. On POD 1 and POD 8, there were no significant differences in lymphocyte proliferation among the three groups. No differences were found between the control and insufflation groups at any point.

CONCLUSIONS

After stimulation, lymphocytes proliferate at a lower rate after laparotomy than after CO(2) insufflation. Significant differences in lymphocyte proliferation rates between groups persist at least through POD 4. By POD 8, the mean lymphocyte proliferation rate in the laparotomy group was back to the baseline level. Our results suggest greater immunosuppression after sham laparotomy than after CO(2) insufflation.

摘要

相似文献

1
Time course of differences in lymphocyte proliferation rates after laparotomy vs CO(2) insufflation.
Surg Endosc. 2000 Feb;14(2):145-8. doi: 10.1007/s004649900087.
2
Lymphocyte proliferation in mice after a full laparotomy is the same whether performed in a sealed carbon dioxide chamber or in room air.小鼠全腹剖腹术后的淋巴细胞增殖情况,无论手术是在密封的二氧化碳 chamber 中还是在室内空气中进行,都是相同的。 (注:原文中“chamber”可能是指特定的实验舱之类的空间,这里直接保留英文未翻译,需结合具体语境准确理解)
Surg Endosc. 2000 Mar;14(3):235-8. doi: 10.1007/s004640000030.
3
Delayed-type hypersensitivity response is better preserved in mice following insufflation than after laparotomy.
Surg Endosc. 1999 Oct;13(10):1032-4. doi: 10.1007/s004649901163.
4
A serum-soluble factor(s) stimulates tumor growth following laparotomy in a murine model.
Surg Endosc. 2000 May;14(5):490-4. doi: 10.1007/s004640020061.
5
Higher colon cancer tumor proliferative index and lower tumor cell death rate in mice undergoing laparotomy versus insufflation.与接受气腹手术的小鼠相比,接受剖腹手术的小鼠结肠癌肿瘤增殖指数更高,肿瘤细胞死亡率更低。
Surg Endosc. 2002 Jan;16(1):36-9. doi: 10.1007/s004640080199. Epub 2001 Oct 19.
6
Postoperative cell mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic vs open colorectal resection in humans.在人类中,与开腹结直肠切除术相比,腹腔镜结直肠切除术后细胞介导的免疫反应能得到更好的保留。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jun;17(6):972-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8263-y. Epub 2003 Mar 19.
7
Tumor proliferative index is higher in mice undergoing laparotomy vs. CO2 pneumoperitoneum.与接受二氧化碳气腹的小鼠相比,接受剖腹手术的小鼠的肿瘤增殖指数更高。
Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Apr;42(4):477-81. doi: 10.1007/BF02234171.
8
Postoperative immune function varies inversely with the degree of surgical trauma in a murine model.在小鼠模型中,术后免疫功能与手术创伤程度呈负相关。
Surg Endosc. 1997 May;11(5):427-30. doi: 10.1007/s004649900383.
9
Effects of laparotomy, and carbon dioxide and air pneumoperitoneum, on cellular immunity and peritoneal host defences in rats.
Eur J Surg. 1999 Mar;165(3):253-8. doi: 10.1080/110241599750007135.
10
Effects of CO(2) pneumoperitoneum on peritoneal macrophage function and peritoneal metastasis in mice with gastric cancer.二氧化碳气腹对胃癌小鼠腹膜巨噬细胞功能及腹膜转移的影响
Eur Surg Res. 2012;48(1):40-7. doi: 10.1159/000334282. Epub 2011 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Rectal mature teratoma: A case report.直肠成熟畸胎瘤:一例报告。
World J Clin Cases. 2022 Aug 6;10(22):7883-7889. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.7883.
2
Immunologic and oncologic implications of laparoscopic surgery: what is the latest?腹腔镜手术的免疫学和肿瘤学意义:最新进展如何?
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2006 Feb;19(1):5-12. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-939525.
3
Laparoscopy as a prognostic factor in curative resection for node positive colorectal cancer: results for a single-institution nonrandomized prospective trial.腹腔镜检查作为淋巴结阳性结直肠癌根治性切除的预后因素:单机构非随机前瞻性试验结果
Surg Endosc. 2004 Jul;18(7):1130-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9152-3. Epub 2004 May 27.
4
Stress response to laparoscopic surgery: a review.腹腔镜手术的应激反应:综述
Surg Endosc. 2004 Jul;18(7):1022-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9169-7. Epub 2004 May 12.
5
Postoperative colonic motility in patients following laparoscopic-assisted and open sigmoid colectomy.腹腔镜辅助与开放式乙状结肠切除术后患者的结肠动力
J Gastrointest Surg. 2003 Dec;7(8):1073-81; discussion 1081. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.08.006.
6
Peritoneal macrophage and blood monocyte functions after open and laparoscopic-assisted cecectomy in rats.大鼠开放式和腹腔镜辅助盲肠切除术后腹膜巨噬细胞和血液单核细胞功能
Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec;17(12):1996-2002. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8154-5. Epub 2003 Oct 23.