Suppr超能文献

高血容量疗法对蛛网膜下腔出血后脑血流量的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Effect of hypervolemic therapy on cerebral blood flow after subarachnoid hemorrhage : a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Lennihan L, Mayer S A, Fink M E, Beckford A, Paik M C, Zhang H, Wu Y C, Klebanoff L M, Raps E C, Solomon R A

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Neurological Institute, College of Physicians and Surgeons, School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.

出版信息

Stroke. 2000 Feb;31(2):383-91. doi: 10.1161/01.str.31.2.383.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cerebral blood flow (CBF) is reduced after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and symptomatic vasospasm is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Volume expansion has been reported to increase CBF after SAH, but CBF values in hypervolemic (HV) and normovolemic (NV) subjects have never been directly compared.

METHODS

On the day after aneurysm clipping, we randomly assigned 82 patients to receive HV or NV fluid management until SAH day 14. In addition to 80 mL/h of isotonic crystalloid, 250 mL of 5% albumin solution was given every 2 hours to maintain normal (NV group, n=41) or elevated (HV group, n=41) cardiac filling pressures. CBF ((133)xenon clearance) was measured before randomization and approximately every 3 days thereafter (mean, 4.5 studies per patient).

RESULTS

HV patients received significantly more fluid and had higher pulmonary artery diastolic and central venous pressures than NV patients, but there was no effect on net fluid balance or on blood volume measured on the third postoperative day. There was no difference in mean global CBF during the treatment period between HV and NV patients (P=0.55, random-effects model). Symptomatic vasospasm occurred in 20% of patients in each group and was associated with reduced minimum regional CBF values (P=0.04). However, there was also no difference in minimum regional CBF between the 2 treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

HV therapy resulted in increased cardiac filling pressures and fluid intake but did not increase CBF or blood volume compared with NV therapy. Although careful fluid management to avoid hypovolemia may reduce the risk of delayed cerebral ischemia after SAH, prophylactic HV therapy is unlikely to confer an additional benefit.

摘要

背景与目的

蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)后脑血流量(CBF)会降低,而症状性血管痉挛是发病和死亡的主要原因。据报道,扩容可增加SAH后的CBF,但高血容量(HV)和正常血容量(NV)受试者的CBF值从未进行过直接比较。

方法

在动脉瘤夹闭术后当天,我们将82例患者随机分为两组,分别接受HV或NV液体管理,直至SAH后第14天。除了每小时80 mL等渗晶体液外,每2小时给予250 mL 5%白蛋白溶液,以维持正常(NV组,n = 41)或升高(HV组,n = 41)的心腔充盈压。在随机分组前及之后大约每3天测量一次CBF((133)氙清除率)(平均每位患者进行4.5次测量)。

结果

HV组患者比NV组患者接受了显著更多的液体,肺动脉舒张压和中心静脉压更高,但对术后第3天的液体净平衡或血容量没有影响。HV组和NV组患者在治疗期间的平均全脑CBF无差异(P = 0.55,随机效应模型)。每组20%的患者发生了症状性血管痉挛,且与最低局部CBF值降低相关(P = 0.04)。然而,两个治疗组之间的最低局部CBF也没有差异。

结论

与NV治疗相比,HV治疗导致心腔充盈压和液体摄入量增加,但未增加CBF或血容量。尽管谨慎的液体管理以避免低血容量可能会降低SAH后迟发性脑缺血的风险,但预防性HV治疗不太可能带来额外益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验