Debrix I, Madelaine I, Grenet N, Roux D, Bardin C, Le Mercier F, Fontan J E, Connor O, Pointereau A, Tilleul P
Pharmacie-Toxicologie, Hopital Tenon, Paris, France.
Pharm World Sci. 1999 Dec;21(6):270-1. doi: 10.1023/a:1008719108916.
To assess whether physicians comply with American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines for the use of CSFs, a prospective survey was performed in 15 Paris university hospitals involved in cancer treatment in 1997. If 45% of the prescriptions complied with the guidelines, primary prophylactic administration, which represented 52% of cases, did not comply with ASCO guidelines. These results suggested that primary prophylactic administration was one major clinical situation in which physicians could benefit from guidance to use a CSFs and that criteria defined by ASCO to allow primary prophylactic administration were not applied in clinical practice.
为评估医生是否遵循美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)关于使用集落刺激因子(CSF)的指南,1997年在巴黎15家参与癌症治疗的大学医院进行了一项前瞻性调查。尽管45%的处方符合指南,但占病例数52%的一级预防性用药却不符合ASCO指南。这些结果表明,一级预防性用药是医生可从CSF使用指导中获益的一个主要临床情形,且ASCO定义的允许一级预防性用药的标准在临床实践中未得到应用。