Triques K, Bourgeois A, Vidal N, Mpoudi-Ngole E, Mulanga-Kabeya C, Nzilambi N, Torimiro N, Saman E, Delaporte E, Peeters M
Laboratoire Rétrovirus, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France.
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2000 Jan 20;16(2):139-51. doi: 10.1089/088922200309485.
We recently reported a high divergence among African subtype F strains. Three well-separated groups (F1, F2, and F3) have been shown based on the phylogenetic analysis of the p24 gag and envelope sequences with genetic distances similar to those observed for known subtypes. In this study, we characterized the near-full-length genomes of two strains from epidemiological unlinked individual belonging to each of the subgroups: F1 (96FR-MP411), F2 (95CM-MP255 and 95CM-MP257), and F3 (96CM-MP535 and 97ZR-EQTB11). Phylogenetic analysis of the near-full-length sequences and for each of the genes separately showed the same three groups, supported by high bootstrap values. Diversity plotting, BLAST subtyping, and bootstrap plotting confirmed that the divergent F strains correspond to nonrecombinant viruses. The divergence between F1 and F2 is consistently lower than that seen in any other intersubtype comparison, with the exception of subtypes B and D. Based on all the different analyses, we propose to divide subtype F into two subclades, with F1 gathering the known subtype F strains from Brazil and Finland, and our African strain (96FR-MP411), and F2 containing the 95CM-MP255 and 95CM-MP257 strains from Cameroon. The F3 strains, 97ZR-EQTB11 from the Democratic Republic of Congo and 96CM-MP535 from Cameroon, meet the criteria of a new subtype designated as K. The equidistance of subtype K to the other subtypes of HIV-1 suggests that this subtype existed as long as the others, the lower distance between B and D, and between F1 and F2 suggest a more recent subdivision for these latter strains.
我们最近报道了非洲F亚型毒株间存在高度差异。基于p24 gag和包膜序列的系统发育分析,已显示出三个明显不同的组(F1、F2和F3),其遗传距离与已知亚型中观察到的相似。在本研究中,我们对来自每个亚组的无流行病学关联个体的两株毒株的近全长基因组进行了特征分析:F1(96FR-MP411)、F2(95CM-MP255和95CM-MP257)以及F3(96CM-MP535和97ZR-EQTB11)。对近全长序列以及每个基因分别进行的系统发育分析显示出相同的三个组,高自展值支持这一结果。多样性绘图、BLAST亚型分型和自展绘图证实,差异较大的F毒株对应于非重组病毒。F1和F2之间的差异始终低于任何其他亚型间比较中观察到的差异,B和D亚型除外。基于所有不同分析,我们建议将F亚型分为两个亚分支,F1包括来自巴西和芬兰的已知F亚型毒株以及我们的非洲毒株(96FR-MP411),F2包含来自喀麦隆的95CM-MP255和95CM-MP257毒株。来自刚果民主共和国的F3毒株97ZR-EQTB11和来自喀麦隆的96CM-MP535符合一种新亚型的标准,该亚型被命名为K。K亚型与HIV-1其他亚型的等距性表明该亚型与其他亚型存在的时间一样长,B和D之间以及F1和F2之间距离较短表明后两者毒株的分化时间更近。