Mens J M, Vleeming A, Snijders C J, Stam H J, Ginai A Z
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Spine J. 1999;8(6):468-73. doi: 10.1007/s005860050206.
Objective signs to assess impairment in patients who are disabled by peripartum pelvic girdle pain hardly exist. The purpose of this study was to develop a clinical test to quantify and qualify disability in these patients. The study examined the relationship between impaired active straight leg raising (ASLR) and mobility of pelvic joints in patients with peripartum pelvic girdle pain, focusing on (1) the reduction of impairment of ASLR when the patient was wearing a pelvic belt, and (2) motions between the pubic bones measured by X-ray examination when the patient was standing on one leg, alternating left and right. Twenty-one non-pregnant patients with peripartum pelvic girdle pain in whom pain and impairment of ASLR were mainly located on one side were selected. ASLR was performed in the supine position, first without a pelvic belt and then with a belt. The influence of the belt on the ability to actively raise the leg was assessed by the patient. Mobility of the pelvic joints was radiographically visualized by means of the Chamberlain method. Assessment was blinded. Ability to perform ASLR was improved by a pelvic belt in 20 of the 21 patients (binomial two-tailed P = 0.0000). When the patient was standing on one leg, alternating the symptomatic side and the reference side, a significant difference between the two sides was observed with respect to the size of the radiographically visualized steps between the pubic bones (binomial two-tailed P = 0.01). The step at the symptomatic side was on average larger when the leg at that side was hanging down than when the patient was standing on the leg at that side. Impairment of ASLR correlates strongly with mobility of the pelvic joints in patients with peripartum pelvic girdle pain. The ASLR test could be a suitable instrument to quantify and qualify disability in diseases related to mobility of the pelvic joints. Further studies are needed to assess the relationship with clinical parameters, sensitivity, specificity and responsiveness in various categories of patients. In contrast with the opinion of Chamberlain, that a radiographically visualized step between the pubic bones is caused by cranial shift of the pubic bone at the side of the standing leg, it is concluded that the step is caused by caudal shift of the pubic bone at the side of the leg hanging down. The caudal shift is caused by an anterior rotation of the hip bone about a horizontal axis near the sacroiliac joint.
评估因围产期骨盆带疼痛而致残患者功能障碍的客观体征几乎不存在。本研究的目的是开发一种临床试验,以量化和界定这些患者的残疾情况。该研究调查了围产期骨盆带疼痛患者主动直腿抬高(ASLR)功能受损与骨盆关节活动度之间的关系,重点关注:(1)患者佩戴骨盆带时ASLR功能受损情况的改善;(2)患者单腿站立时,左右交替,通过X线检查测量耻骨间的运动。选取了21例非孕围产期骨盆带疼痛患者,其疼痛和ASLR功能受损主要位于一侧。在仰卧位进行ASLR测试,先不佩戴骨盆带,然后佩戴骨盆带。由患者评估骨盆带对主动抬腿能力的影响。采用张伯伦方法通过X线影像学观察骨盆关节的活动度。评估过程采用盲法。21例患者中有20例佩戴骨盆带后ASLR能力得到改善(二项式双侧P = 0.0000)。当患者单腿站立,左右交替患侧和参照侧时,耻骨间X线影像学显示的间隙大小在两侧之间存在显著差异(二项式双侧P = 0.01)。患侧腿下垂时,该侧耻骨间的间隙平均比患者单腿站立在该侧时更大。围产期骨盆带疼痛患者中,ASLR功能受损与骨盆关节活动度密切相关。ASLR测试可能是一种适用于量化和界定与骨盆关节活动度相关疾病残疾情况的工具。需要进一步研究以评估其与临床参数、不同类别患者的敏感性、特异性和反应性之间的关系。与张伯伦的观点相反,即耻骨间X线影像学显示的间隙是由站立侧耻骨的颅侧移位引起,本研究得出结论,该间隙是由下垂腿侧耻骨的尾侧移位引起。尾侧移位是由髋骨围绕骶髂关节附近的水平轴向前旋转所致。