Coley K C, Carter C S, DaPos S V, Maxwell R, Wilson J W, Branch R A
Center for Clinical Pharmacology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA 15213, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;60(12):850-6. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v60n1208.
Therapeutic ineffectiveness and noncompliance with antipsychotic agents are major contributors to rehospitalization in patients with psychotic disorders. It is unknown whether risperidone's favorable side effect profile compared with that of the conventional antipsychotics results in improved compliance and reduced hospitalizations in a naturalistic setting. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that treatment with risperidone reduces readmission rates and associated costs when compared with treatment with perphenazine or haloperidol.
Inpatients prescribed either risperidone, perphenazine, or haloperidol between January 1, 1995, and December 31, 1995, as a single oral antipsychotic at discharge were retrospectively identified. Data were collected for that index hospitalization and for a 1-year follow-up period. Primary outcome measures included re-admission rates, changes in antipsychotic therapy, anticholinergic drug use, and costs.
There were 202 evaluable patients (81 treated with risperidone, 78 with perphenazine, and 43 with haloperidol). Baseline demographics were similar between groups except that more patients in the risperidone group had a primary diagnosis of psychotic disorder or had been hospitalized in the year prior to study. The percentage of patients readmitted during the 1-year follow-up period was similar among drug groups (41% risperidone, 26% perphenazine, and 35% haloperidol) when controlled for baseline differences in diagnosis and hospitalization history (p = .32). Anticholinergic drug use was more common in the haloperidol group (p = .004). Mean yearly cost (drug + hospitalization) in the risperidone group was $20,317, nearly double that in the other treatment groups (p < .001).
The results from this naturalistic study indicate that the high cost of risperidone is not offset by a reduction in readmission rates when compared with conventional antipsychotics.
治疗无效和不依从抗精神病药物是导致精神障碍患者再次住院的主要因素。与传统抗精神病药物相比,利培酮具有良好的副作用谱,这是否会在自然环境中提高患者的依从性并减少住院率尚不清楚。本研究的目的是检验以下假设:与奋乃静或氟哌啶醇治疗相比,利培酮治疗可降低再入院率及相关费用。
回顾性确定1995年1月1日至1995年12月31日期间出院时作为单一口服抗精神病药物使用利培酮、奋乃静或氟哌啶醇的住院患者。收集该次索引住院及1年随访期的数据。主要结局指标包括再入院率、抗精神病治疗的变化、抗胆碱能药物的使用及费用。
共有202例可评估患者(81例使用利培酮治疗,78例使用奋乃静治疗,43例使用氟哌啶醇治疗)。除利培酮组更多患者的主要诊断为精神障碍或在研究前一年曾住院外,各组间基线人口统计学特征相似。在控制诊断和住院史的基线差异后,各药物组在1年随访期内再次入院的患者百分比相似(利培酮组为41%,奋乃静组为26%,氟哌啶醇组为35%,p = 0.32)。氟哌啶醇组抗胆碱能药物的使用更为常见(p = 0.004)。利培酮组的年均费用(药物 + 住院)为20317美元,几乎是其他治疗组的两倍(p < 0.001)。
这项自然研究的结果表明,与传统抗精神病药物相比,利培酮的高成本并未因再入院率的降低而得到抵消。