Bhana N, Foster R H, Olney R, Plosker G L
Adis International Limited, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, New Zealand.
Drugs. 2001;61(1):111-61. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200161010-00011.
Olanzapine, a thienobenzodiazepine derivative, is a second generation (atypical) antipsychotic agent which has proven efficacy against the positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Compared with conventional antipsychotics, it has greater affinity for serotonin 5-HT2A than for dopamine D2 receptors. In large, well controlled trials in patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses, olanzapine 5 to 20 mg/day was significantly superior to haloperidol 5 to 20 mg/day in overall improvements in psychopathology rating scales and in the treatment of depressive and negative symptoms, and was comparable in effects on positive psychotic symptoms. The 1-year risk of relapse (rehospitalisation) was significantly lower with olanzapine than with haloperidol treatment. In the first double-blind comparative study (28-week) of olanzapine and risperidone, olanzapine 10 to 20 mg/day proved to be significantly more effective than risperidone 4 to 12 mg/day in the treatment of negative and depressive symptoms but not on overall psychopathology symptoms. In contrast, preliminary results from an 8-week controlled study suggested risperidone 2 to 6 mg/day was superior to olanzapine 5 to 20 mg/day against positive and anxiety/depressive symptoms (p < 0.05), although consistent with the first study, both agents demonstrated similar efficacy on measures of overall psychopathology. Improvements in general cognitive function seen with olanzapine treatment in a 1-year controlled study of patients with early-phase schizophrenia, were significantly greater than changes seen with either risperidone or haloperidol. However, preliminary results from an 8-week trial showed comparable cognitive enhancing effects of olanzapine and risperidone treatment in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. Several studies indicate that olanzapine has benefits against symptoms of aggression and agitation, while other studies strongly support the effectiveness of olanzapine in the treatment of depressive symptomatology. Olanzapine is associated with significantly fewer extrapyramidal symptoms than haloperidol and risperidone. In addition, olanzapine is not associated with a risk of agranulocytosis as seen with clozapine or clinically significant hyperprolactinaemia as seen with risperidone or prolongation of the QT interval. The most common adverse effects reported with olanzapine are bodyweight gain, somnolence, dizziness, anticholinergic effects (constipation and dry mouth) and transient asymptomatic liver enzyme elevations. In comparison with haloperidol, the adverse events reported significantly more frequently with olanzapine in > or = 3.5% of patients were dry mouth, bodyweight gain and increased appetite and compared with risperidone, only bodyweight gain occurred significantly more frequently with olanzapine. The high acquisition cost of olanzapine is offset by reductions in other treatment costs (inpatient and/or outpatient services) of schizophrenia. Pharmacoeconomic analyses indicate that olanzapine does not significantly increase, and may even decrease, the overall direct treatment costs of schizophrenia, compared with haloperidol. Compared with risperidone, olanzapine has also been reported to decrease overall treatment costs, despite the several-fold higher daily acquisition cost of the drug. Olanzapine treatment improves quality of life in patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses to a greater extent than haloperidol, and to broadly the same extent as risperidone.
Olanzapine demonstrated superior antipsychotic efficacy compared with haloperidol in the treatment of acute phase schizophrenia, and in the treatment of some patients with first-episode or treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The reduced risk of adverse events and therapeutic superiority compared with haloperidol and risperidone in the treatment of negative and depressive symptoms support the choice of olanzapine as a first-line option in the management of schizophrenia in the acute phase and for the maintenance of treatment response.
奥氮平是一种噻吩并苯二氮䓬衍生物,属于第二代(非典型)抗精神病药物,已证实对精神分裂症的阳性和阴性症状均有效。与传统抗精神病药物相比,它对5-羟色胺5-HT2A的亲和力比对多巴胺D2受体的亲和力更高。在针对精神分裂症或相关精神病患者的大型、严格对照试验中,奥氮平5至20毫克/天在精神病理学评定量表的总体改善以及抑郁和阴性症状的治疗方面显著优于氟哌啶醇5至20毫克/天,且在对阳性精神病性症状的疗效上与之相当。奥氮平治疗的1年复发(再次住院)风险显著低于氟哌啶醇治疗。在奥氮平和利培酮的首个双盲对照研究(28周)中,奥氮平10至20毫克/天在阴性和抑郁症状的治疗上被证明比利培酮4至12毫克/天显著更有效,但在总体精神病理学症状方面并非如此。相比之下,一项8周对照研究的初步结果表明,利培酮2至6毫克/天在对抗阳性和焦虑/抑郁症状方面优于奥氮平5至20毫克/天(p<0.05),不过与第一项研究一致的是,两种药物在总体精神病理学指标上显示出相似的疗效。在一项针对早期精神分裂症患者的1年对照研究中,奥氮平治疗带来的一般认知功能改善显著大于利培酮或氟哌啶醇治疗带来的变化。然而,一项8周试验的初步结果显示,奥氮平和利培酮治疗对精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者的认知增强作用相当。多项研究表明奥氮平对攻击和激越症状有益,而其他研究有力地支持了奥氮平在治疗抑郁症状方面的有效性。与氟哌啶醇和利培酮相比,奥氮平引起的锥体外系症状明显更少。此外,奥氮平不像氯氮平那样有粒细胞缺乏症风险,也不像利培酮那样有临床上显著的高泌乳素血症风险或QT间期延长。奥氮平报告的最常见不良反应是体重增加、嗜睡、头晕、抗胆碱能作用(便秘和口干)以及短暂无症状的肝酶升高。与氟哌啶醇相比,在≥3.5%的患者中奥氮平报告显著更频繁的不良事件是口干、体重增加和食欲增加,与利培酮相比,只有体重增加在奥氮平治疗中显著更频繁出现。奥氮平高昂的购置成本因精神分裂症其他治疗成本(住院和/或门诊服务)的降低而得到抵消。药物经济学分析表明,与氟哌啶醇相比,奥氮平不会显著增加甚至可能降低精神分裂症的总体直接治疗成本。与利培酮相比,尽管奥氮平的每日购置成本高出数倍,但也有报告称其降低了总体治疗成本。奥氮平治疗比氟哌啶醇更大程度地改善了精神分裂症及相关精神病患者的生活质量,与利培酮改善程度大致相同。
在治疗急性期精神分裂症以及一些首发或难治性精神分裂症患者时,奥氮平显示出优于氟哌啶醇的抗精神病疗效。与氟哌啶醇和利培酮相比,其不良事件风险降低以及在阴性和抑郁症状治疗方面的治疗优势支持将奥氮平作为急性期精神分裂症管理及维持治疗反应的一线选择。