Suppr超能文献

私人诊所中全瓷冠的留存情况:一项前瞻性临床试验。

Survival of In-Ceram crowns in a private practice: a prospective clinical trial.

作者信息

McLaren E A, White S N

机构信息

School of Dentistry, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif., USA.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2000 Feb;83(2):216-22. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(00)80015-3.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Prior reports on some all-ceramic crown systems have indicated high failure rates through fracture.

PURPOSE

This study prospectively evaluated the survival of infiltrated alumina crowns (In-Ceram) in a private practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All the In-Ceram crowns placed in a prosthodontic practice since its introduction in 1990 were serially included. Patients were recalled at 6 monthly intervals. Those who did not attend in the previous 6 months were contacted by telephone and a series of answers to standardized questions recorded. The few patients who were lost to follow-up or who died were removed from the study from the time of last contact.

RESULTS

A total of 408 crowns in 107 patients were followed for periods from 1 to 86 months. As the 3-year data combined a meaningful period of service with a large sample size, these data were focused on. The 3-year survival rate was 96% for a sample size of 223. Three-year data indicated that core fracture and porcelain fracture occurred at rates of approximately 0.6% and 0.3% per year, respectively. Otherwise sound restorations were removed at a rate of approximately 0.3% per year for esthetic, endodontic, or prosthetic reasons. Anterior crowns tended to have a slightly higher 3-year survival rate (98%) than premolars or molars (94%).

CONCLUSION

Clinical failure rate of In-Ceram crowns was low. Crowns were lost because of core fracture, porcelain fracture, and removal without failure. Failure tended to be more common for molar and premolar crowns than for anterior crowns.

摘要

问题陈述

先前关于一些全瓷冠系统的报告表明,其因断裂导致的失败率很高。

目的

本研究前瞻性地评估了在私人诊所中渗透氧化铝全瓷冠(In-Ceram)的存留情况。

材料与方法

自1990年引入以来,该修复科所放置的所有In-Ceram全瓷冠均被依次纳入研究。患者每6个月复诊一次。对过去6个月未复诊的患者进行电话随访,并记录一系列标准化问题的答案。少数失访或死亡的患者从最后一次联系时起被排除在研究之外。

结果

对107例患者的总共408颗全瓷冠进行了1至86个月的随访。由于3年的数据结合了有意义的使用期和大样本量,因此重点关注这些数据。对于223例样本,3年存留率为96%。3年数据表明,核断裂和瓷断裂的发生率分别约为每年0.6%和0.3%。因美观、牙髓或修复原因,完好的修复体每年被拆除的比例约为0.3%。前牙全瓷冠的3年存留率(98%)往往略高于前磨牙或磨牙(94%)。

结论

In-Ceram全瓷冠的临床失败率较低。全瓷冠因核断裂、瓷断裂以及无失败情况下的拆除而丢失。磨牙和前磨牙全瓷冠的失败往往比前牙全瓷冠更常见。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验