D'souza Kathleen Manuela, Aras Meena Ajay
Department of Prosthodontics, Goa Dental College and Hospital, Bambolim, Goa, India.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017 Jan-Mar;17(1):53-60. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.197938.
Badly broken or structurally compromised posterior teeth are frequently associated with crown/root fracture. Numerous restorative materials have been used to fabricate indirect full-coverage restorations for such teeth. This study aims to evaluate and compare the effect of restorative materials on the stress distribution pattern in a mandibular first molar tooth, under varying loading conditions and to compare the stress distribution pattern in five commonly used indirect restorative materials.
Five three-dimensional finite element models representing a mandibular first molar tooth restored with crowns of gold, porcelain fused to metal, composite (Artglass), alumina-based zirconia (In-Ceram Zirconia [ICZ]), and double-layered zirconia-based materials (zirconia core veneered with porcelain, Lava) were constructed, using a Finite Element Analysis Software (ANSYS version 10; ANSYS Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USA). Two loading conditions were applied, simulating maximum bite force of 600 N axially and normal masticatory bite force of 225 N axially and nonaxially.
Both all-ceramic crowns allowed the least amount of stress distribution to the surrounding tooth structure. In maximum bite force-simulation test, alumina-based all-ceramic crown displayed the highest von Mises stresses (123.745 MPa). In the masticatory bite force-simulation test, both all-ceramic crowns (122.503-133.13 MPa) displayed the highest von Mises stresses.
ICZ crown displayed the highest peak von Mises stress values under maximum and masticatory bite forces. ICZ and Lava crowns also allowed the least amount of stress distribution to the surrounding tooth structure, which is indicative of a favorable response of the underlying tooth structure to the overlying full-coverage indirect restorative material. These results suggest that ICZ and Lava crowns can be recommended for clinical use in cases of badly damaged teeth.
严重折断或结构受损的后牙常伴有冠根折裂。众多修复材料已被用于制作此类牙齿的间接全冠修复体。本研究旨在评估和比较修复材料在下颌第一磨牙不同加载条件下对应力分布模式的影响,并比较五种常用间接修复材料中的应力分布模式。
使用有限元分析软件(ANSYS 10版;美国宾夕法尼亚州卡农斯堡的ANSYS公司)构建五个三维有限元模型,分别代表用金冠、烤瓷熔附金属冠、复合树脂(Artglass)、氧化铝基氧化锆(In-Ceram Zirconia [ICZ])和双层氧化锆基材料(氧化锆核瓷贴面,Lava)修复的下颌第一磨牙。施加两种加载条件,轴向模拟600N的最大咬合力以及轴向和非轴向225N的正常咀嚼咬合力。
两种全瓷冠对周围牙齿结构的应力分布最少。在最大咬合力模拟测试中,氧化铝基全瓷冠显示出最高的冯·米塞斯应力(123.745MPa)。在咀嚼咬合力模拟测试中,两种全瓷冠(122.503 - 133.13MPa)均显示出最高的冯·米塞斯应力。
ICZ冠在最大咬合力和咀嚼咬合力下显示出最高的冯·米塞斯应力峰值。ICZ和Lava冠对周围牙齿结构的应力分布也最少,这表明下方牙齿结构对上覆全冠间接修复材料有良好反应。这些结果表明,对于严重受损牙齿的病例,ICZ和Lava冠可推荐用于临床。