• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

七氟醚与丙泊酚在麻醉维持与苏醒中的比较

[Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol in the maintenance of and recovery from anesthesia].

作者信息

Rodiño S, Rama P, Pensado A, Dávila M L, Molins N, Fraga M

机构信息

Servicio de Anestesia y Reanimación, Complexo Hospitalario Juan Canalejo, A Coruña.

出版信息

Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1999 Dec;46(10):427-32.

PMID:10670263
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the recovery of patients after anesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol during open urological surgery or lumbar column surgery of intermediate duration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-six ASA I, II or II patients were enrolled prospectively and randomly assigned to two groups to receive either sevoflurane (n = 19) or proporol (n = 17). Anesthetic induction was accomplished with thiopental, fentanil and vecuronium. During anesthetic maintenance a mixture of 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen plus the drug under study was adjusted to keep blood pressure and/or heart rate within +/- 20% of baseline. After surgery we recorded time until eye opening, spontaneous breathing, extubation, orientation, and identification of parts of the body. Side effects were likewise recorded. In the postanesthetic recovery ward patient condition was assessed using the Aldrete scale, the Newman-Trieger test and a visual analog scale for postoperative pain. Consumption of analgesic during the first 24 h after surgery was monitored.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found in demographic data; duration of anesthesia; anesthetic doses; or time until spontaneous breathing, extubation, orientation or identification of parts of the body. Only time until eye opening was shorter in the sevoflurane group than in the propofol group (6.9 +/- 3.3 vs 11.5 +/- 4.8 min; p < 0.05). No differences were recorded on scales reflecting intermediate-term recovery. Analgesic consumption and the incidence of side effects were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Sevoflurane and propofol are comparable for anesthetic maintenance in urological and neurological procedures of intermediate duration.

摘要

目的

比较在泌尿外科开放手术或中等时长的腰椎手术中,使用七氟醚或丙泊酚麻醉后患者的恢复情况。

患者与方法

前瞻性纳入36例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级为I、II或III级的患者,并随机分为两组,分别接受七氟醚(n = 19)或丙泊酚(n = 17)麻醉。麻醉诱导采用硫喷妥钠、芬太尼和维库溴铵。麻醉维持期间,调整含60%氧化亚氮的氧气与研究药物的混合气体,使血压和/或心率维持在基线值的±20%以内。术后记录睁眼时间、自主呼吸恢复时间、拔管时间、定向力恢复时间以及身体部位识别时间。同时记录副作用情况。在麻醉后恢复病房,使用Aldrete评分、Newman-Trieger试验和术后疼痛视觉模拟评分评估患者状况。监测术后24小时内的镇痛药消耗量。

结果

在人口统计学数据、麻醉时长、麻醉剂量、自主呼吸恢复时间、拔管时间、定向力恢复时间或身体部位识别时间方面,未发现显著差异。仅七氟醚组的睁眼时间短于丙泊酚组(6.9 ± 3.3 vs 11.5 ± 4.8分钟;p < 0.05)。在反映中期恢复的评分上未记录到差异。两组的镇痛药消耗量和副作用发生率相似。

结论

在中等时长的泌尿外科和神经外科手术中,七氟醚和丙泊酚用于麻醉维持的效果相当。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of sevoflurane and propofol in the maintenance of and recovery from anesthesia].七氟醚与丙泊酚在麻醉维持与苏醒中的比较
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1999 Dec;46(10):427-32.
2
[Immediate anesthesia recovery and psychomotor function of patient after prolonged anesthesia with desflurane, sevoflurane or isoflurane].[地氟烷、七氟烷或异氟烷长时间麻醉后患者的即刻麻醉恢复及精神运动功能]
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2000 Nov;47(9):386-92.
3
A comparison: the efficacy of sevoflurane-nitrous oxide or propofol-nitrous oxide for the induction and maintenance of general anesthesia.一项比较:七氟醚-氧化亚氮或丙泊酚-氧化亚氮用于全身麻醉诱导和维持的疗效。
J Clin Anesth. 1996 Dec;8(8):639-43. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(96)00172-9.
4
Sevoflurane for interventional neuroradiology procedures is associated with more rapid early recovery than propofol.在介入神经放射学手术中,与丙泊酚相比,七氟醚可使患者更早更快地恢复。
Can J Anaesth. 2004 May;51(5):486-91. doi: 10.1007/BF03018313.
5
Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia and sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia for outpatient otorhinolaryngeal surgery.全凭静脉麻醉与七氟醚-芬太尼麻醉用于门诊耳鼻喉科手术的比较。
J Clin Anesth. 2002 Aug;14(5):324-8. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(02)00367-7.
6
Propofol and sevoflurane during epidural/general anesthesia: comparison of early recovery characteristics and pain relief.硬膜外/全身麻醉期间丙泊酚与七氟醚的比较:早期恢复特征及疼痛缓解情况
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Jun;17(5):819-32.
7
The comparative effects of sevoflurane versus propofol in the induction and maintenance of anesthesia in adult patients.七氟醚与丙泊酚对成年患者麻醉诱导和维持的比较效果。
Anesth Analg. 1996 Mar;82(3):479-85. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199603000-00009.
8
[A comparative study of the use of sevoflurane and propofol in ambulatory surgery].七氟醚与丙泊酚在门诊手术中应用的比较研究
Anaesthesist. 1996 Feb;45 Suppl 1:S57-62.
9
Anesthesia management for the super obese: is sevoflurane superior to propofol as a sole anesthetic agent? A double-blind randomized controlled trial.超级肥胖患者的麻醉管理:七氟醚作为单一麻醉剂是否优于丙泊酚?一项双盲随机对照试验。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015 Jul;19(13):2493-500.
10
[TIVA with propofol-remifentanil or balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane-fentanyl in laparoscopic operations. Hemodynamics, awakening and adverse effects].[腹腔镜手术中丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼靶控输注麻醉与七氟醚-芬太尼平衡麻醉。血流动力学、苏醒及不良反应]
Anaesthesist. 1999 Nov;48(11):807-12. doi: 10.1007/s001010050789.