Cuadrado M J, Khamashta M A, Ballesteros A, Godfrey T, Simon M J, Hughes G R
Lupus Research Unit, Rayne Institute, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2000 Jan;79(1):57-68. doi: 10.1097/00005792-200001000-00006.
Hughes (antiphospholipid) syndrome (APS) can mimic multiple sclerosis (MS). We analyzed the clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings of MS-like expression in a cohort of patients with APS in an attempt to identify parameters that might differentiate the 2 entities. We studied 27 patients who were referred to our unit with the diagnosis of probable or definite MS made by a neurologist. All patients were referred to our lupus clinic because of symptoms suggesting an underlying connective tissue disease, uncommon findings for MS on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), atypical evolution of MS, or antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) positivity. aPL, antinuclear antibody (ANA), anti-dsDNA, and anti-extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) antibodies were measured by standard methods. MRI was performed in every patient and compared with MRI of 25 definite MS patients who did not have aPL. An index severity score was calculated based on the size and number of increased signal intensity areas in MRI. In the past medical history, 8 patients with primary APS and 6 with APS secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) had had symptoms related to these conditions. Neurologic symptoms and physical examination of the patients were not different from those common in MS patients. Laboratory findings were not a useful tool to distinguish APS from MS. When MRI from APS patients was compared globally with MRI from MS patients, MS patients had significantly increased severity score in white matter (p < 0.001), cerebellum (p = 0.035), pons (p < 0.015), and when all areas were taken together (p < 0.001). Patients with APS had significantly increased scores in the putamen (p < 0.01). No differences were noticed in the degree of atrophy. When taken individually, MRI from APS patients could not be distinguished from MRI from MS patients. Most of the patients with primary APS showed a good response to oral anticoagulant treatment. In patients with secondary APS, the outcome was poorer. Hughes syndrome (APS) and MS can be difficult to distinguish. A careful medical history, a previous history of thrombosis and/or fetal loss, an abnormal localization of the lesions in MRI, and the response to anticoagulant therapy might be helpful in the differential diagnosis. We believe that testing for aPL should become routine in all patients with MS.
休斯(抗磷脂)综合征(APS)可酷似多发性硬化症(MS)。我们分析了一组APS患者中类似MS表现的临床、实验室及影像学检查结果,试图找出可区分这两种疾病的参数。我们研究了27例被神经科医生诊断为可能或确诊MS并转诊至我科的患者。所有患者因提示潜在结缔组织病的症状、磁共振成像(MRI)上MS不常见的表现、MS的非典型病程或抗磷脂抗体(aPL)阳性而被转诊至我们的狼疮门诊。采用标准方法检测aPL、抗核抗体(ANA)、抗双链DNA及抗可提取核抗原(ENA)抗体。对每位患者进行了MRI检查,并与25例无aPL的确诊MS患者的MRI进行比较。根据MRI上信号强度增加区域的大小和数量计算出一个指数严重程度评分。在既往病史中,8例原发性APS患者和6例继发于系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的APS患者有与这些疾病相关的症状。患者的神经系统症状和体格检查与MS患者常见的症状并无不同。实验室检查结果并非区分APS与MS的有用工具。将APS患者的MRI与MS患者的MRI整体比较时,MS患者在白质(p<0.001)、小脑(p=0.035)、脑桥(p<0.015)以及所有区域综合起来(p<0.001)的严重程度评分显著增加。APS患者在壳核的评分显著增加(p<0.01)。未发现萎缩程度有差异。单独来看,APS患者的MRI与MS患者的MRI无法区分。大多数原发性APS患者对口服抗凝治疗反应良好。继发APS患者的预后较差。休斯综合征(APS)和MS可能难以区分。详细的病史、既往血栓形成和/或胎儿丢失史、MRI上病变的异常定位以及对抗凝治疗的反应可能有助于鉴别诊断。我们认为,对所有MS患者进行aPL检测应成为常规检查。