Lee V S, Hertzberg B S, Workman M J, Smith T P, Kliewer M A, DeLong D M, Carroll B A
Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Radiology. 2000 Feb;214(2):387-92. doi: 10.1148/radiology.214.2.r00fe25387.
To determine the effect of variability of common carotid arterial (CCA) velocities on velocity ratios used to assess internal carotid arterial (ICA) stenosis.
Doppler ultrasonographic (US) velocity measurements were obtained at three levels in the CCA and in the carotid bulb and ICA in all patients referred for carotid US between September 1996 and October 1997. Only ICAs (n = 98, in 57 patients) without ipsilateral CCA disease at angiography were analyzed. The range of CCA peak systolic velocities (PSVs) and end diastolic velocities (EDVs) and velocity ratios were calculated for each CCA measurement. For each ICA/CCA velocity ratio, receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed.
CCA PSV and EDV ranges averaged 23.1 cm/sec +/- 15.7 (SD) and 5.1 cm/sec +/- 3.6, respectively. For a given side, the difference averaged 1.0 +/- 1.3 for PSV ratios and 2.7 +/- 6.9 for EDV ratios, depending on where CCA measurements were taken. By using a threshold of 60% stenosis as indication for endarterectomy, variability in CCA velocities could have altered recommendations in 16 (28%) of 57 patients. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that ratios made by using the three CCA velocities or their mean were not significantly different.
Variability in velocity measurements along the course of the CCA in patients with ICA disease can be substantial and can result in inaccuracies in assessment of carotid stenosis.
确定颈总动脉(CCA)速度变异性对用于评估颈内动脉(ICA)狭窄的速度比值的影响。
1996年9月至1997年10月期间,对所有因颈动脉超声检查前来就诊的患者,在CCA的三个水平以及颈动脉球部和ICA处进行多普勒超声(US)速度测量。仅分析血管造影显示无同侧CCA疾病的ICA(57例患者中的98条)。计算每次CCA测量的CCA收缩期峰值速度(PSV)和舒张末期速度(EDV)范围以及速度比值。对每个ICA/CCA速度比值进行受试者操作特征分析。
CCA的PSV和EDV范围平均分别为23.1 cm/秒±15.7(标准差)和5.1 cm/秒±3.6。对于给定的一侧,PSV比值的平均差异为1.0±1.3,EDV比值的平均差异为2.7±6.9,这取决于CCA测量的位置。以60%狭窄作为内膜切除术指征的阈值,CCA速度的变异性可能改变了57例患者中16例(28%)的治疗建议。受试者操作特征分析表明,使用三种CCA速度或其平均值得出的比值无显著差异。
ICA疾病患者沿CCA走行的速度测量变异性可能很大,并可能导致颈动脉狭窄评估不准确。