Kamberi M, Nakashima H, Ogawa K, Oda N, Nakano S
The Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Oita Medical University, Oita, Japan.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Feb;49(2):98-103. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2000.00118.x.
To investigate the effect of sucralfate on sparfloxacin absorption when administered concurrently or at strategically spaced dosing times designed to avoid the potential interaction.
The study was a four-way crossover design where eight healthy Japanese volunteers were randomized to one of four treatment sequences at entry. A 300 mg dose of sparfloxacin was administered alone for treatment A (control). Treatments B, C and D included sucralfate 1.5 g every 12 h for five doses. For treatment B, the fifth dose of sucralfate was administered concurrently with sparfloxacin 300 mg. For treatment C, 300 mg sparfloxacin was given 2 h prior to the fifth dose of sucralfate. Treatment D consisted of sparfloxacin 300 mg given 4 h prior to the fifth dose of sucralfate. Blood and urine samples were collected at predetermined time intervals for 72 h. Sparfloxacin concentrations in plasma and urine and the concentrations of sparfloxacin metabolite in urine were determined by high performance liquid chromatography assays.
Sucralfate administrated concurrently with sparfloxacin decreased the mean AUC(0,infinity) of sparfloxacin 2-fold (P<0.001) and the mean Cmax 2.1-fold (P<0.001) compared with sparfloxacin alone. When sucralfate was administrated 2 h after sparfloxacin, the mean AUC(0,infinity) was decreased 1.5-fold (P<0.01) and the mean Cmax 1.4-fold (P<0.01). Sucralfate did not alter the extent of absorption of sparfloxacin when it was given 4 h after the administration of sparfloxacin. The relative bioavailabilities for treatments B, C and D were 0.50 (95% CI: 0.35-0.65), 0.64 (95% CI: 0. 51-0.77), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.81-1.03), respectively, relative to sparfloxacin alone. The mean percentage of the sparfloxacin dose recovered in urine was significantly lower after sparfloxacin was administered with sucralfate than after sparfloxacin was administered alone or 2 h before the sucralfate dose (P<0.001). Treatments B, C and D were demonstrated to be equivalent to treatment A in the rate of absorption. The tmax, CLr and t1/2 were not significantly affected by sucralfate. The metabolism of sparfloxacin was not altered in the presence of sucralfate.
Oral administration of sucralfate with sparfloxacin or 2 h after sparfloxacin, decreased the extent of sparfloxacin absorption. When both drugs are to be administered together, sucralfate should be administered 4 h after sparfloxacin, allowing thus sufficient time for sparfloxacin absorption prior to the sucralfate dose and thereby minimizing the chance of a significant interaction.
研究同时服用或在设计好的、旨在避免潜在相互作用的间隔给药时间服用硫糖铝时,其对司帕沙星吸收的影响。
本研究采用四交叉设计,8名健康日本志愿者在入组时随机分为4种治疗顺序之一。治疗A(对照)单独给予300mg司帕沙星。治疗B、C和D包括每12小时服用1.5g硫糖铝,共服用5剂。治疗B中,第5剂硫糖铝与300mg司帕沙星同时服用。治疗C中,在第5剂硫糖铝服用前2小时给予300mg司帕沙星。治疗D包括在第5剂硫糖铝服用前4小时给予300mg司帕沙星。在预定的时间间隔内采集血样和尿样,持续72小时。采用高效液相色谱法测定血浆和尿液中司帕沙星的浓度以及尿液中司帕沙星代谢物的浓度。
与单独服用司帕沙星相比,硫糖铝与司帕沙星同时服用时,司帕沙星的平均AUC(0,∞)降低了2倍(P<0.001),平均Cmax降低了2.1倍(P<0.001)。当在司帕沙星服用后2小时服用硫糖铝时,平均AUC(0,∞)降低了1.5倍(P<0.01),平均Cmax降低了1.4倍(P<0.01)。当在司帕沙星服用后4小时服用硫糖铝时,硫糖铝未改变司帕沙星的吸收程度。治疗B、C和D相对于单独服用司帕沙星的相对生物利用度分别为0.50(95%CI:0.35 - 0.65)、0.64(95%CI:0.51 - 0.77)和0.92(95%CI:0.81 - 1.03)。与单独服用司帕沙星或在硫糖铝剂量前2小时服用司帕沙星相比,司帕沙星与硫糖铝同时服用后,尿液中回收的司帕沙星剂量平均百分比显著降低(P<0.001)。治疗B、C和D在吸收速率上被证明与治疗A等效。硫糖铝对tmax、CLr和t1/2无显著影响。在有硫糖铝存在的情况下,司帕沙星的代谢未改变。
硫糖铝与司帕沙星同时口服或在司帕沙星服用后2小时口服,会降低司帕沙星的吸收程度。当两种药物需同时给药时,硫糖铝应在司帕沙星服用后4小时给药 , 从而在硫糖铝给药前为司帕沙星吸收留出足够时间,进而将显著相互作用的可能性降至最低。