Ozgen T, Oruckaptan H H, Ozcan O E, Acikgoz B
Department of Neurosurgery, Hacettepe University School of Medicine Ankara, Türkiye.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1999;141(12):1287-94. doi: 10.1007/s007010050432.
We performed this retrospective analysis to determine the efficacy of surgery and radiotherapy over hormonal and volumetric control of prolactinomas, many of which had failed during dopa-agonist therapy. In the same analysis, the efficiency of topical bromocriptine application as a preliminary study was compared with standard treatment modalities.
Between 1982-1997, 429 prolactinoma patients who underwent surgery at Hacettepe University Neurosurgery Department and at Bayindir Medical Center were included in this study. All patients were classified according to Hardy's classification scheme and were further divided into 'invasive' and 'non-invasive' groups based on this radiological classification system. The mean follow-up time was 38.4 months. One hundred and thirty five patients had peroperative bromocriptine application into the sellar cavity and these, either receiving radiotherapy (RT) or not, were analysed separately from the other 294 patients. In the early post-operative period, 104 of these patients were given conventional radiotherapy with median dose of 4500 cGy. We focused on the effects of surgery and radiotherapy over volumetric and hormonal tumour control on the basis of invasion characteristics and the early results of topical bromocriptine application in macroprolactinoma patients; and compared our results with the literature.
Statistical analysis revealed that radiotherapy was not effective over hormonal and volumetric tumour control for prolactinomas. We did not observe any correlation to dural invasion of the sellar floor, recurrence, and the disease-free survival time. Topical bromocriptine application seemed to improve the volumetric control in 135 selected macroprolactinoma patients but not hormonal response compared with the standard treatment modalities.
Conventional radiotherapy is not as effective as expected for prolactinomas and should not be preferred considering its adverse effects. Tumoural infiltration of the sellar dura mater is not a prognostic criterion for recurrence expectation and, therefore, should not be a criterion for radiotherapy after surgery. After subtotal removal, postoperative dopa-agonist therapy should be considered even if the patient was intolerant or resistant to previous treatment since surgery seems to improve patients' drug tolerance and cooperation due probably to the lower dose requirement. The early results of topical bromocriptine application seem to improve volumetric tumour control but this should not be accepted as a judgement since we need to wait for later results and to expand the sample size for more reliable interpretation.
我们进行这项回顾性分析,以确定手术和放疗在泌乳素瘤的激素控制及体积控制方面的疗效,其中许多泌乳素瘤在多巴胺激动剂治疗期间已失效。在同一分析中,将局部应用溴隐亭作为初步研究的有效性与标准治疗方式进行了比较。
1982年至1997年间,纳入了在哈杰泰佩大学神经外科和巴因迪尔医疗中心接受手术的429例泌乳素瘤患者。所有患者均根据哈代分类方案进行分类,并基于该放射学分类系统进一步分为“侵袭性”和“非侵袭性”组。平均随访时间为38.4个月。135例患者在手术中向鞍腔内应用了溴隐亭,这些患者无论是否接受放疗(RT),均与其他294例患者分开分析。在术后早期,这些患者中的104例接受了中位剂量为4500 cGy的常规放疗。我们基于侵袭特征以及大泌乳素瘤患者局部应用溴隐亭的早期结果,重点关注手术和放疗对肿瘤体积和激素控制的影响;并将我们的结果与文献进行了比较。
统计分析显示,放疗在泌乳素瘤的激素和体积控制方面无效。我们未观察到与鞍底硬脑膜侵袭、复发及无病生存时间之间存在任何相关性。与标准治疗方式相比,局部应用溴隐亭似乎改善了135例选定的大泌乳素瘤患者的体积控制,但未改善激素反应。
常规放疗对泌乳素瘤的效果不如预期,考虑到其不良反应,不应优先选择。鞍区硬脑膜的肿瘤浸润不是预测复发的预后标准,因此,不应作为术后放疗的标准。在次全切除术后,即使患者之前对治疗不耐受或耐药,也应考虑术后多巴胺激动剂治疗,因为手术似乎由于剂量需求降低而提高了患者的药物耐受性和依从性。局部应用溴隐亭的早期结果似乎改善了肿瘤体积控制,但由于我们需要等待后续结果并扩大样本量以进行更可靠的解读,因此不应将此作为定论。