Cristofolini L, Viceconti M
Engineering Faculty, University of Bologna, Italy.
J Biomech. 2000 Mar;33(3):279-88. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00186-4.
Composite synthetic models of the human tibia have recently become commercially available as substitutes for cadaveric specimens. Their use is justified by the advantages they offer as a substitute for real tibias. The present investigation concentrated on an extensive experimental validation of the mechanical behaviour of the whole bone composite model, compared to human specimens for different loading conditions. The stiffness of the tibias was measured with a torsional load applied along the long axis, and with a bending load applied both in the latero-medial and in the antero-posterior direction. The bending stiffness of the composite tibias matched well with that of the cadaveric specimens. This was not true for the torsional stiffness. In fact, the composite tibias were much stiffer than the cadaveric specimens, possibly due to the structure of the reinforcement material. The inter-specimen variability for the composite tibias was much lower than that for the cadaveric specimens. Thus, it seems that the composite tibias are suitable to replace cadaveric specimens for certain types of test, whereas they might be unsuitable for others, depending on the loading regimen.
人体胫骨的复合合成模型最近已作为尸体标本的替代品投入商业使用。它们作为真实胫骨的替代品所具有的优势证明了其用途的合理性。本研究集中于对全骨复合模型的力学行为进行广泛的实验验证,并与不同加载条件下的人体标本进行比较。沿着长轴施加扭转载荷以及在内外侧和前后方向施加弯曲载荷来测量胫骨的刚度。复合胫骨的弯曲刚度与尸体标本的弯曲刚度匹配良好。扭转刚度则并非如此。事实上,复合胫骨比尸体标本硬得多,这可能是由于增强材料的结构所致。复合胫骨的标本间变异性远低于尸体标本。因此,对于某些类型的测试,复合胫骨似乎适合替代尸体标本,而根据加载方案,它们可能不适用于其他测试。