• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于颈动脉内膜切除术的颈丛神经阻滞麻醉:罗哌卡因与甲哌卡因的比较

Cervical plexus anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: comparison of ropivacaine and mepivacaine.

作者信息

Leoni A, Magrin S, Mascotto G, Rigamonti A, Gallioli G, Muzzolon F, Fanelli G, Casati A

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 2000 Feb;47(2):185-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03018858.

DOI:10.1007/BF03018858
PMID:10674516
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness of cervical plexus block performed with ropivacaine 0.75% or 1%, or mepivacaine 2%.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, 60 patients received deep cervical plexus block with 0.2 ml x kg(-1) divided among C2-C4 injections using ropivacaine 0.75% and 1% or mepivacaine 2%. A blinded observer recorded loss of pin-prick sensation every minute in the C2-C4 dermatomes until readiness for surgery. Then, a superficial cervical block was performed with 0.15 ml x kg(-1) lidocaine 1%. The need for intraoperative supplemental analgesia and degree of pain and time of first postoperative pain medication were also recorded.

RESULTS

General anesthesia was not required to complete surgery in any case. No differences in the need for intraoperative supplemental analgesia was observed (7, 6, and 9 patients with ropivacaine 0.75% and 1% or mepivacaine 2%, respectively). Readiness to surgery required 15 (10-25) min with ropivacaine 0.75%, 18 (8-20) min with ropivacaine 1%, and 15 (5-20) min with mepivacaine 2% (P = NS); while patients asked for first postoperative pain medication after 10 (4-13) hr and 9 (6.5 - 11) hr with ropivacaine 0.75% and 1% compared with 5 (0-8) hr with mepivacaine 2% (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Ropivacaine 0.75% or 1% are appropriate choices when performing cervical plexus anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy, providing nerve block characteristics similar to those of mepivacaine 2%, but with the advantage of longer postoperative pain relief.

摘要

目的

评估0.75%或1%罗哌卡因或2%甲哌卡因用于颈丛阻滞的效果。

方法

在一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究中,60例患者接受了深颈丛阻滞,将0.2 ml/kg的药物分注于C2 - C4,使用0.75%和1%的罗哌卡因或2%的甲哌卡因。一名盲法观察者每分钟记录C2 - C4皮节针刺觉丧失情况,直至准备手术。然后,用0.15 ml/kg的1%利多卡因进行浅颈丛阻滞。记录术中追加镇痛的需求、疼痛程度及术后首次使用镇痛药物的时间。

结果

所有病例均无需全身麻醉来完成手术。术中追加镇痛的需求无差异(分别有7例、6例和9例患者使用0.75%和1%罗哌卡因或2%甲哌卡因)。使用0.75%罗哌卡因时,准备手术需要15(10 - 25)分钟;使用1%罗哌卡因时为18(8 - 20)分钟;使用2%甲哌卡因时为15(5 - 20)分钟(P = 无显著性差异);与使用2%甲哌卡因的患者术后5(0 - 8)小时相比,使用0.75%和1%罗哌卡因的患者术后10(4 - 13)小时和9(6.5 - 11)小时要求首次使用镇痛药物(P<0.05)。

结论

在为颈动脉内膜切除术进行颈丛麻醉时,0.75%或1%罗哌卡因是合适的选择,其神经阻滞特性与2%甲哌卡因相似,但术后镇痛时间更长。

相似文献

1
Cervical plexus anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: comparison of ropivacaine and mepivacaine.用于颈动脉内膜切除术的颈丛神经阻滞麻醉:罗哌卡因与甲哌卡因的比较
Can J Anaesth. 2000 Feb;47(2):185-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03018858.
2
Does clonidine 50 microg improve cervical plexus block obtained with ropivacaine 150 mg for carotid endarterectomy? A randomized, double-blinded study.可乐定50微克能否改善用150毫克罗哌卡因进行颈丛阻滞用于颈动脉内膜切除术的效果?一项随机双盲研究。
J Clin Anesth. 2006 Dec;18(8):585-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.03.016.
3
The superficial cervical plexus block for postoperative pain therapy in carotid artery surgery. A prospective randomised controlled trial.颈浅丛阻滞用于颈动脉手术术后疼痛治疗:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Jan;33(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.06.024. Epub 2006 Sep 8.
4
Ropivacaine produces sensory blockade in the lumbar sacral region more frequently than mepivacaine in lower thoracic epidural anesthesia.在胸段硬膜外麻醉中,罗哌卡因比甲哌卡因更常引起腰骶部感觉阻滞。
J Anesth. 2004;18(4):250-6. doi: 10.1007/s00540-004-0262-4.
5
Pain relief and motor function during continuous interscalene analgesia after open shoulder surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison between levobupivacaine 0.25%, and ropivacaine 0.25% or 0.4%.开放性肩部手术后持续肌间沟镇痛期间的疼痛缓解和运动功能:0.25%左旋布比卡因与0.25%或0.4%罗哌卡因的前瞻性、随机、双盲比较
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Dec;23(12):1005-9. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506000962. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
6
Improving postoperative analgesia after axillary brachial plexus anesthesia with 0.75% ropivacaine. A double-blind evaluation of adding clonidine.用0.75%罗哌卡因改善腋路臂丛神经麻醉后的术后镇痛效果。可乐定添加效果的双盲评估。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2001 May;67(5):407-12.
7
Prospective randomized, blind comparison of ropivacaine and levobupivacaine for superficial plexus anesthesia in carotid endoarterectomy.罗哌卡因与左旋布比卡因用于颈动脉内膜切除术浅表神经丛麻醉的前瞻性随机、双盲比较
Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 Jan-Feb;75(1-2):7-12.
8
Regional anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: a comparison between ropivacaine and levobupivacaine.颈动脉内膜切除术的区域麻醉:罗哌卡因与左旋布比卡因的比较
Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 May;75(5):231-7.
9
The addition of fentanyl to local anesthetics affects the quality and duration of cervical plexus block: a randomized, controlled trial.芬太尼加入局麻药会影响颈丛阻滞的质量和持续时间:一项随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):234-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e1e9ab. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
10
Lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block for knee arthroplasty: comparison of ropivacaine and bupivacaine.用于膝关节置换术的腰丛和坐骨神经阻滞:罗哌卡因与布比卡因的比较
Can J Anaesth. 1998 Nov;45(11):1094-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03012398.

引用本文的文献

1
[Regional anesthesia for carotid surgery : An overview of anatomy, techniques and their clinical relevance].[颈动脉手术的区域麻醉:解剖、技术及其临床相关性概述]
Anaesthesist. 2017 Apr;66(4):283-290. doi: 10.1007/s00101-017-0270-z.
2
Regional anaesthesia in the elderly: a clinical guide.老年患者区域麻醉:临床指南
Drugs Aging. 2004;21(14):895-910. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200421140-00001.
3
Ropivacaine: an update of its use in regional anaesthesia.罗哌卡因:区域麻醉应用的最新进展。
Drugs. 2000 Nov;60(5):1065-93. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200060050-00007.