Rubio A, Gómez-Cano M, Puig T, Leal M, Pérez-Olmeda M, Ruiz L, Clotet B, Rey C, Zamora L, Xaus N, Soriano V
Department of Biochemistry, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Antivir Ther. 1999;4(1):45-9.
Patients harbouring drug-resistance viruses usually suffer a rise in serum viraemia after a variable period of time. We have investigated the relationship between the appearance of resistant genotypes and the viral load of each patient after treatment. Our objective was to assess the association between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA plasma levels and the number of drug resistance-associated point mutations after treatment. A total of 150 patients from three reference centres in Spain (Madrid, Barcelona and Seville) from a previous study (Erase Study) were included. Patients had at that time undergone antiretroviral treatment with nucleoside analogues for at least 1 year (zidovudine/didanosine; zidovudine/zalcitabine; zidovudine/zalcitabine/lamivudine; zidovudine/didanosine/lamivudine). In this study, plasma viraemia in these patients was quantified and a line probe assay was used to determine the genotype of the virus. Viral load was significantly higher in patients harbouring virus with more than three mutations than in those individuals who harboured wild-type strains (P < 0.05). Surprisingly, when patients with viral load < 500 copies/ml (13/150) were analysed, only two carried wild-type strains, whereas three had virus with more than three point mutations. The viral load of six samples was assayed using an ultrasensitive test (detection limit < 20 copies/ml). Of the three samples where viral load was < 20 copies/ml, one patient harboured wild-type virus, whereas two carried mutant virus strains. These results suggest that even in patients with undetectable viral loads by conventional methods, viral replication may continue and mutations develop. Therefore, standard values of plasma viraemia for measuring the effectiveness of the treatment should be reconsidered when patients are on antiviral regimens of just two or three nucleoside analogues.
携带耐药病毒的患者通常在一段可变的时间后血清病毒血症会升高。我们研究了耐药基因型的出现与治疗后每位患者病毒载量之间的关系。我们的目的是评估治疗后人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)RNA血浆水平与耐药相关点突变数量之间的关联。纳入了来自西班牙三个参考中心(马德里、巴塞罗那和塞维利亚)先前一项研究(消除研究)的150名患者。当时这些患者已接受核苷类似物抗逆转录病毒治疗至少1年(齐多夫定/去羟肌苷;齐多夫定/扎西他滨;齐多夫定/扎西他滨/拉米夫定;齐多夫定/去羟肌苷/拉米夫定)。在本研究中,对这些患者的血浆病毒血症进行了定量,并使用线性探针分析来确定病毒的基因型。携带三个以上突变病毒的患者的病毒载量显著高于携带野生型毒株的个体(P<0.05)。令人惊讶的是,当分析病毒载量<500拷贝/ml的患者(13/150)时,只有两名携带野生型毒株,而三名携带三个以上点突变的病毒。使用超灵敏检测(检测限<20拷贝/ml)对六个样本的病毒载量进行了检测。在病毒载量<20拷贝/ml的三个样本中,一名患者携带野生型病毒,而两名携带突变病毒株。这些结果表明,即使在通过传统方法检测不到病毒载量的患者中,病毒复制仍可能继续并发生突变。因此,当患者接受仅两种或三种核苷类似物的抗病毒治疗方案时,应重新考虑用于衡量治疗效果的血浆病毒血症标准值。