Yano K, Grove J S, Masaki K H, White L R, Petrovitch H, Chen R, Teng E L, Ross G W, Rodriguez B L, Curb J D
Honolulu Heart Program, Kuakini Medical Center, Hawaii, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Feb;48(2):199-204. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03912.x.
To examine the association of years spent in Japan during childhood with cognitive test performance in late life among Japanese American men, and to assess the influence of the language used for testing on this association.
A cross-sectional study.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3734 Japanese American men, aged 71-93 years, who were first- or second-generation migrants and living on Oahu Island, Hawaii.
The outcome variable was cognitive test performance assessed using the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI), which was developed for cross-cultural studies of cognitive impairment. The explanatory variable of main interest was the number of years spent in Japan during school-age childhood years (ages 6-17). The associations of CASI scores with childhood years in Japan was evaluated using a stepwise multiple linear regression model in which a total of 40 potential confounders were included as covariates.
In the total sample, there was an inverse association between CASI scores and middle childhood years in Japan. This association remained significant after controlling for age, education, socioeconomic status, traditional Japanese food consumption, pulmonary function, apolipoprotein E4, proficiency in speaking Japanese, and other possible confounders. When data were analyzed separately for subgroups according to the language preferred at testing (English or Japanese), associations between childhood years in Japan and CASI scores were in opposite directions negative for the group tested in English and positive for the group tested in Japanese. The interaction between the testing language and childhood years in Japan was statistically significant.
There was an inverse association between years spent in Japan during school-age years of childhood and cognitive test performance in late life. This association could not be accounted for by age, education, or other confounding factors. However, this finding was not observed in participants who preferred being tested in Japanese. To assess cognitive test performance in older people, it is of prime importance to use the most optimal language for testing, usually the subject's native language.
研究日裔美国男性童年时期在日本生活的年限与晚年认知测试表现之间的关联,并评估测试所用语言对这种关联的影响。
横断面研究。
设置/参与者:共有3734名年龄在71 - 93岁之间的日裔美国男性,他们是第一代或第二代移民,居住在夏威夷瓦胡岛。
结果变量是使用认知能力筛查工具(CASI)评估的认知测试表现,该工具是为认知障碍的跨文化研究而开发的。主要关注的解释变量是学龄期童年(6 - 17岁)在日本生活的年限。使用逐步多元线性回归模型评估CASI分数与在日本的童年年限之间的关联,该模型纳入了总共40个潜在混杂因素作为协变量。
在总样本中,CASI分数与童年中期在日本生活的年限之间存在负相关。在控制了年龄、教育程度、社会经济地位、传统日本食物消费、肺功能、载脂蛋白E4、日语口语能力和其他可能的混杂因素后,这种关联仍然显著。当根据测试时偏好的语言(英语或日语)对亚组分别进行数据分析时,在日本的童年年限与CASI分数之间的关联方向相反,英语测试组为负,日语测试组为正。测试语言与在日本的童年年限之间的交互作用具有统计学意义。
学龄期童年在日本生活的年限与晚年认知测试表现之间存在负相关。这种关联不能用年龄、教育程度或其他混杂因素来解释。然而,在偏好日语测试的参与者中未观察到这一发现。为了评估老年人的认知测试表现,使用最适合的测试语言(通常是受试者的母语)至关重要。