Nowakowska E, Kus K, Chodera A, Rybakowski J
Department of Pharmacology, University School of Medicine, Poznań, Poland.
Arzneimittelforschung. 2000 Jan;50(1):5-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1300156.
The behavioural effects of two antidepressants with opposite molecular mechanisms, tianeptine 7-[(3-chloro-6,11-dihydro-6-methyldibenzo[c,f][1,2]thiazepin - 11-yl)amino]heptanoic acid S,S-dioxide, CAS 66981-73-5) 5 mg/kg p.o., a serotonin reuptake enhancer, and fluoxetine (+/-)-N-methyl-3-phenyl-3-[(alpha, alpha, alpha-trifluoro-p- tolyl)oxy]propylamine, CAS 54910-89-3) 5 mg/kg p.o., a serotonin reuptake inhibitor, were compared after single and prolonged administration (7 and 14 days) once daily). In all experiments the drug effects were noted at the peak activity time: 30 min after tianeptine and 60 min after fluoxetine administration. In the immobility time test both drugs had a shortening effect on immobility time only after prolonged administration or, in single treatment, after joint administration. A different pattern was observed in the two compartment test: both antidepressants showed anxiolytic effects after single and prolonged treatment. However, when the drugs were given in joint administration, the anxiolytic effects were entirely abolished after single as well as prolonged treatment. In reference spatial memory test (food finding time in the maze) tianeptine had no effect, whereas fluoxetine caused, after single and prolonged treatment, a very marked improvement of reference memory. Joint administration of both drugs resulted in worsening the effects on memory in comparison to fluoxetine alone, but the results were still significantly better vs. control. In the test for sedative action (in the Activity Meter AM-1, where the movements of the animals are counted electronically) only after prolonged treatment with tianeptine a diminished locomotor activity could be observed. It is concluded that in the action of the drugs (beside the effect on serotonin uptake) other mechanisms must play an important role. The diminished locomotor activity after tianeptine suggests an influence on the dopaminergic or GABA-Receptor system.
比较了两种分子机制相反的抗抑郁药的行为效应,即噻奈普汀(7 - [(3 - 氯 - 6,11 - 二氢 - 6 - 甲基二苯并[c,f][1,2]噻嗪 - 11 - 基)氨基]庚酸S,S - 二氧化物,CAS 66981 - 73 - 5),5毫克/千克口服,一种5 - 羟色胺再摄取增强剂,以及氟西汀((+/-)-N - 甲基 - 3 - 苯基 - 3 - [(α,α,α - 三氟 - 对甲苯基)氧基]丙胺,CAS 54910 - 89 - 3),5毫克/千克口服,一种5 - 羟色胺再摄取抑制剂,单次给药和长期给药(7天和14天,每日一次)后进行比较。在所有实验中,在活动高峰期记录药物效应:噻奈普汀给药后30分钟,氟西汀给药后60分钟。在不动时间测试中,两种药物仅在长期给药后或单次联合给药时对不动时间有缩短作用。在两室测试中观察到不同模式:两种抗抑郁药在单次和长期治疗后均显示出抗焦虑作用。然而,当联合给药时,单次和长期治疗后抗焦虑作用均完全消失。在参考空间记忆测试(迷宫中寻找食物的时间)中,噻奈普汀无作用,而氟西汀在单次和长期治疗后导致参考记忆有非常明显的改善。与单独使用氟西汀相比,两种药物联合给药导致对记忆的影响变差,但结果仍显著优于对照组。在镇静作用测试(在活动计AM - 1中,通过电子方式计算动物的活动)中,仅在噻奈普汀长期治疗后可观察到运动活动减少。得出结论,在药物作用中(除了对5 - 羟色胺摄取的影响外)其他机制必定起重要作用。噻奈普汀后运动活动减少表明对多巴胺能或GABA受体系统有影响。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2000-1
Eksp Klin Farmakol. 2005
Arzneimittelforschung. 2003
Alcohol Alcohol. 1992-1
Food Sci Biotechnol. 2017-7-13
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018-7-11
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2016-3-8
Mol Neurodegener. 2010-3-12
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007-4
CNS Drugs. 2001